Literature DB >> 22854570

Cellular bioluminescence imaging.

David K Welsh, Takako Noguchi.   

Abstract

Bioluminescence imaging of live cells has recently been recognized as an important alternative to fluorescence imaging. Fluorescent probes are much brighter than bioluminescent probes (luciferase enzymes) and, therefore, provide much better spatial and temporal resolution and much better contrast for delineating cell structure. However, with bioluminescence imaging there is virtually no background or toxicity. As a result, bioluminescence can be superior to fluorescence for detecting and quantifying molecules and their interactions in living cells, particularly in long-term studies. Structurally diverse luciferases from beetle and marine species have been used for a wide variety of applications, including tracking cells in vivo, detecting protein-protein interactions, measuring levels of calcium and other signaling molecules, detecting protease activity, and reporting circadian clock gene expression. Such applications can be optimized by the use of brighter and variously colored luciferases, brighter microscope optics, and ultrasensitive, low-noise cameras. This article presents a review of how bioluminescence differs from fluorescence, its applications to cellular imaging, and available probes, optics, and detectors. It also gives practical suggestions for optimal bioluminescence imaging of single cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22854570     DOI: 10.1101/pdb.top070607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Protoc        ISSN: 1559-6095


  29 in total

1.  Modular platform for low-light microscopy.

Authors:  Tae Jin Kim; Silvan Tuerkcan; Andrew Ceballos; Guillem Pratx
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Modular low-light microscope for imaging cellular bioluminescence and radioluminescence.

Authors:  Tae Jin Kim; Silvan Türkcan; Guillem Pratx
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 3.  Studying circadian rhythms in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Ozgur Tataroglu; Patrick Emery
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.608

4.  Fluorophore-NanoLuc BRET Reporters Enable Sensitive In Vivo Optical Imaging and Flow Cytometry for Monitoring Tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Franz X Schaub; Md Shamim Reza; Colin A Flaveny; Weimin Li; Adele M Musicant; Sany Hoxha; Min Guo; John L Cleveland; Antonio L Amelio
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Circadian rhythms in the mouse reproductive axis during the estrous cycle and pregnancy.

Authors:  Alexandra M Yaw; Thu V Duong; Duong Nguyen; Hanne M Hoffmann
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 4.164

Review 6.  Measuring synchrony in the mammalian central circadian circuit.

Authors:  Erik D Herzog; István Z Kiss; Cristina Mazuski
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2014-12-26       Impact factor: 1.600

Review 7.  The importance of determining circadian parameters in pharmacological studies.

Authors:  Laetitia S Gaspar; Ana Rita Álvaro; Sara Carmo-Silva; Alexandrina Ferreira Mendes; Angela Relógio; Cláudia Cavadas
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2019-07-06       Impact factor: 8.739

8.  Cellular circadian oscillators in the suprachiasmatic nucleus remain coupled in the absence of connexin-36.

Authors:  Tanja Diemer; Dominic Landgraf; Takako Noguchi; Haiyun Pan; Jose L Moreno; David K Welsh
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Fibroblast PER2 circadian rhythmicity depends on cell density.

Authors:  Takako Noguchi; Lexie L Wang; David K Welsh
Journal:  J Biol Rhythms       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.182

10.  A biocompatible in vivo ligation reaction and its application for noninvasive bioluminescent imaging of protease activity in living mice.

Authors:  Aurélien Godinat; Hyo Min Park; Stephen C Miller; Ke Cheng; Douglas Hanahan; Laura E Sanman; Matthew Bogyo; Allen Yu; Gennady F Nikitin; Andreas Stahl; Elena A Dubikovskaya
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 5.100

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.