Literature DB >> 22854344

A long-term survivorship comparison between cemented and uncemented cups with shelf grafts in revision total hip arthroplasty after dysplasia.

Amir Sternheim1, Mansour Abolghasemian, Oleg A Safir, David Backstein, Allan E Gross, Paul R Kuzyk.   

Abstract

Long-term outcomes of cemented and uncemented cups were compared in patients with hip dysplasia who had undergone revision hip arthroplasty. Patients had uncontained superolateral acetabular defects reconstructed with a structural allograft. This retrospective study compared 18 cemented acetabular cups to 27 uncemented acetabular cups. Average follow-up was 216 months (range, 96-312). Nineteen acetabular cups (42%) failed due to loosening and were revised. The 10- and 20-year cup survival was 88% and 76% in the uncemented group and 67% and 36% in the cemented group. Log rank analysis showed this difference to be significant (P = .0077). Uncemented acetabular cups performed significantly better than cemented cups.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22854344     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  8 in total

Review 1.  Acetabular reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  George W Fryhofer; Sireesh Ramesh; Neil P Sheth
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-12-02

2.  Long-term clinical outcome of acetabular cup revision surgery: comparison of cemented cups, cementless cups, and cemented cups with reinforcement devices.

Authors:  Yasuo Kokubo; Hisashi Oki; Daisuke Sugita; Kohei Negoro; Kenichi Takeno; Tsuyoshi Miyazaki; Hideaki Nakajima
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-03-24

3.  Fate of bone grafting for acetabular defects in total hip replacement.

Authors:  Anil Thomas Oommen; Vignesh Prasad Krishnamoorthy; Pradeep Mathew Poonnoose; Ravi Jacob Korula
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.251

4.  Satisfying Results of Primary Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Hip Dysplasia at a Mean Followup of 20 Years.

Authors:  Ena Colo; Wim H C Rijnen; Jean W M Gardeniers; Albert van Kampen; B Willem Schreurs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Mid-term outcomes of uncemented or cemented arthroplasty revision following metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty failure: a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Zhao Chen; Wenli Chen; Weiguang Yu; Mingdong Zhao; Jinluan Lin; Chaoming Zhou; Hui Chen; Junxing Ye; Xianshang Zeng; Jintao Zhuang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 6.  Conversion from a failed proximal femoral nail anti-rotation to a cemented or uncemented total hip arthroplasty device: a retrospective review of 198 hips with previous intertrochanteric femur fractures.

Authors:  Weiguang Yu; Xiulan Han; Wenli Chen; Shuai Mao; Mingdong Zhao; Xinchao Zhang; Guowei Han; Junxing Ye; Meiji Chen; Jintao Zhuang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Can porous tantalum acetabular cups and augments restore the hip centre of rotation in revision hip arthroplasty? Long-term results.

Authors:  Chiara Concina; Marina Crucil; Franco Gherlinzoni
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2022-03-10

8.  Cemented versus uncemented total hip replacement for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: a retrospective, multicentre study with a mean 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Shuai Mao; Baomin Chen; Ying Zhu; Liang Qian; Jinluan Lin; Xinchao Zhang; Weiguang Yu; Guowei Han
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 2.359

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.