Literature DB >> 22854066

Scintigraphic assessment of salivary function after intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: correlations with parotid dose and quality of life.

Wen-Cheng Chen1, Chia-Hsuan Lai, Tsair-Fwu Lee, Chao-Hsiung Hung, Kuo-Chi Liu, Ming-Fong Tsai, Wen-Hung Wang, Hungcheng Chen, Fu-Ming Fang, Miao-Fen Chen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We investigated salivary function using quantitative scintigraphy and sought to identify functional correlations between parotid dose and quality of life (QoL) for head and neck cancer (HNC) patients receiving intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between August, 2007 and June, 2008, 31 patients treated IMRT for HNC were enrolled in this prospective study. Salivary excretion function (SEF) was previously measured by salivary scintigraphy at annual intervals for 2 years after IMRT. A dose-volume histogram of each parotid gland was calculated, and the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) was used to determine the tolerance dose. QoL was longitudinally assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30 and H&N35 questionnaires prior to RT, and at one, three, 12 and 24 months after RT.
RESULTS: A significant correlation was found between the reduction of SEF and the mean parotid dose measured at 1 year (correlation coefficient, R(2)=0.651) and 2 years (R(2)=0.310) after IMRT (p<0.001). The TD(50) of the parotid gland at 1 year after IMRT is 43.6 Gy, comparable to results from western countries. We further found that contralateral parotid and submandibular gland function preservation was correlated with reduced sticky saliva and a better QoL compared to the functional preservation of both parotid glands, as determined by the EORTC QLQ-H&N35 questionnaire.
CONCLUSION: A significant correlation was found between the reduction of SEF and the mean parotid dose. Preservation of contralateral parotid and submandibular gland function predicts a better QoL compared to preservation of the function of both parotid glands.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22854066     DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2012.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Oncol        ISSN: 1368-8375            Impact factor:   5.337


  18 in total

Review 1.  Revisiting the dose constraints for head and neck OARs in the current era of IMRT.

Authors:  N Patrik Brodin; Wolfgang A Tomé
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 5.337

2.  Comparison of swallowing function after intensity-modulated radiation therapy and conventional radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Barbara Roa Pauloski; Alfred W Rademaker; Jerilyn A Logemann; Muveddet Discekici-Harris; Bharat B Mittal
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.147

3.  Systematic Review of Normal Tissue Complication Models Relevant to Standard Fractionation Radiation Therapy of the Head and Neck Region Published After the QUANTEC Reports.

Authors:  N Patrik Brodin; Rafi Kabarriti; Madhur K Garg; Chandan Guha; Wolfgang A Tomé
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Mathematical evaluation of post-radiotherapy salivary gland function using salivary gland scintigraphy.

Authors:  Tomohiro Itonaga; Koichi Tokuuye; Ryuji Mikami; Akira Shimizu; Hiroki Sato; Mana Yoshimura; Kiyoaki Tsukahara; Kazuhiro Saito
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Prospective longitudinal assessment of parotid gland function using dynamic quantitative pertechnate scintigraphy and estimation of dose-response relationship of parotid-sparing radiotherapy in head-neck cancers.

Authors:  Tejpal Gupta; Chandni Hotwani; Sadhana Kannan; Zubin Master; Venkatesh Rangarajan; Vedang Murthy; Ashwini Budrukkar; Sarbani Ghosh-Laskar; Jai Prakash Agarwal
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Determining appropriate timing of adaptive radiation therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma during intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Huixian Huang; Heming Lu; Guosheng Feng; Hailan Jiang; Jiaxin Chen; Jinjian Cheng; Qiang Pang; Zhiping Lu; Junzhao Gu; Luxing Peng; Shan Deng; Ying Mo; Danling Wu; Yinglin Wei
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 7.  How to improve the survival rate of implants after radiotherapy for head and neck cancer?

Authors:  Min Zheng; Li Li; Yaling Tang; Xin-Hua Liang
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 2.614

8.  Patient- and therapy-related factors associated with the incidence of xerostomia in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients receiving parotid-sparing helical tomotherapy.

Authors:  Tsair-Fwu Lee; Ming-Hsiang Liou; Hui-Min Ting; Liyun Chang; Hsiao-Yi Lee; Stephen Wan Leung; Chih-Jen Huang; Pei-Ju Chao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Image-guided radiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Nam P Nguyen; Sarah Kratz; Claire Lemanski; Jacqueline Vock; Vincent Vinh-Hung; Alexander Chi; Fabio Almeida; Michael Betz; Rihan Khan; Juan Godinez; Ulf Karlsson; Fred Ampil
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Elective nodal dose of 60 Gy or 50 Gy in head and neck cancers: A matched pair analysis of outcomes and toxicity.

Authors:  Vedang Murthy; Lavanya Gurram; Sadhana Kannan; Minakshi Gandhi; Tejpal Gupta; Sarbani Ghosh Laskar; Ashwini Budrukkar; Jai Prakash Agarwal
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-06-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.