Literature DB >> 22853653

Stimulation of cadaverine production by foodborne pathogens in the presence of Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, and Streptococcus spp.

Esmeray Kuley1, Esra Balıkcı, Ilyas Özoğul, Saadet Gökdogan, Fatih Ozoğul.   

Abstract

The effect of Lactobacillus plantarum (FI8595), Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris MG 1363), Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis (IL 1403), and Streptococcus thermophilus on cadaverine and other biogenic amine production by foodborne pathogens was investigated lysine decarboxylase broth. Both of lactic acid bacteria and foodborne pathogens used (especially Staphylococcus aureus, E. coli, Lc. lactis subsp. lactis and Lb. plantarum) had an ability to convert aminoacids into biogenic amine. The conversion of lysine into cadaverine was the highest (167.11 mg/L) by Lactobacillus spp. Gram-positive bacteria generally had a greater ability to produce cadaverine with corresponding value of 46.26, 53.76, and 154.54 mg/L for Enterococcus faecalis, S. aureus, and Listeria monocytogenes, respectively. Significant variations on biogenic amine production were observed in the presence of lactic acid bacteria strains (P < 0.05). The role of lactic acid bacteria on biogenic amine production by foodborne pathogens varied depending on strains and specific amine. Cadaverine accumulation by Enterobactericeae was increased in the presence of lactic acid bacteria strains except for St. thermophilus, which induced 2-fold lower cadaverine production by S. Paratyphi A. Lc. lactis subsp. lactis and Lc. lactis subsp. cremoris induced 10-fold higher increases in histamine for E. coli and K. pneumoniae, respectively. Lactic acid bacteria resulted in strong increases in cadaverine production by P. aeruginosa, although remarkable decreases were observed for histamine, spermidine, dopamine, agmatine, and TMA in the presence of lactic acid bacteria in lysine decarboxylase broth . The result of the study showed that amine positive lactic acid bacteria strains in fermented food led to significant amine accumulation by contaminant bacteria and their accumulation in food product may be controlled by the use of proper starters with amine-negative activity.
© 2012 Institute of Food Technologists®

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22853653     DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2012.02825.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Sci        ISSN: 0022-1147            Impact factor:   3.167


  6 in total

Review 1.  May the Force Be With You: The Light and Dark Sides of the Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis in Neuropsychiatry.

Authors:  Eoin Sherwin; Kiran V Sandhu; Timothy G Dinan; John F Cryan
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.749

2.  The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis in Neuropsychiatric Disorders: Pathophysiological Mechanisms and Novel Treatments.

Authors:  Yong-Ku Kim; Cheolmin Shin
Journal:  Curr Neuropharmacol       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 7.363

3.  Carrot Juice Fermentations as Man-Made Microbial Ecosystems Dominated by Lactic Acid Bacteria.

Authors:  Sander Wuyts; Wannes Van Beeck; Eline F M Oerlemans; Stijn Wittouck; Ingmar J J Claes; Ilke De Boeck; Stefan Weckx; Bart Lievens; Luc De Vuyst; Sarah Lebeer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Quantitative Analysis of Biogenic Amines in Different Cheese Varieties Obtained from the Korean Domestic and Retail Markets.

Authors:  Sujatha Kandasamy; Jayeon Yoo; Jeonghee Yun; Han Byul Kang; Kuk-Hwan Seol; Jun-Sang Ham
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2021-01-04

5.  Different Ultrasound Exposure Times Influence the Physicochemical and Microbial Quality Properties in Probiotic Goat Milk Yogurt.

Authors:  Karina Delgado; Carla Vieira; Ilyes Dammak; Beatriz Frasão; Ana Brígida; Marion Costa; Carlos Conte-Junior
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 6.  Shedding light on biological sex differences and microbiota-gut-brain axis: a comprehensive review of its roles in neuropsychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Parnian Shobeiri; Amirali Kalantari; Antônio L Teixeira; Nima Rezaei
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 5.027

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.