Literature DB >> 22852871

Repeat stool testing for Clostridium difficile using enzyme immunoassay in patients with inflammatory bowel disease increases diagnostic yield.

Abhishek Deshpande1, Vinay Pasupuleti, Preethi Patel, Chaitanya Pant, Mangesh Pagadala, Geraldine Hall, Bo Hu, Anil Jain, David D K Rolston, Thomas J Sferra, Ashish Atreja.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The incidence and severity of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is increasing. CDI is diagnosed by toxin enzyme immunoassay (EIA) or real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) performed on stool samples. An earlier study evaluating EIA in IBD patients with CDI suggested that more than one stool sample be tested to increase diagnostic yield. We investigated whether repeat stool testing improves diagnostic accuracy for CDI in hospitalized IBD patients compared to hospitalized patients with CDI and no IBD.
METHODS: We performed retrospective data analysis from January 2005-May 2011 on 63,086 hospitalized patients who were tested for CDI using EIA or PCR. Of these, 2579 patients had IBD. Transition probabilities were calculated based on results from repeated tests.
RESULTS: Inclusive of all inpatients tested for CDI, 56,583 were tested using toxin EIA and 6503 were tested using PCR. In patients with no IBD, the first stool sample tested was positive in 90% and 94% with EIA and PCR respectively. In IBD patients tested using EIA, 101 were diagnosed with CDI. The first stool sample tested was positive in 81% of patients. Successive second and third stool samples yielded additional 14% and 5% CDI positive IBD patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one in five IBD patients with CDI required repeat testing to yield a positive result with EIA. There are minimal diagnostic gains of repeat testing by EIA or PCR in patients without IBD. We recommend repeat stool testing for CDI when using EIA to increase diagnostic yield in IBD patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22852871     DOI: 10.1185/03007995.2012.717529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  6 in total

1.  [Diagnostic options. Indications and validity].

Authors:  A Stallmach; M Bürger; M Weber
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 2.  Clostridium difficile infection in inflammatory bowel disease: challenges in diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Ying M Tang; Christian D Stone
Journal:  Clin J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-02-16

Review 3.  Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: an ongoing conundrum for clinicians and for clinical laboratories.

Authors:  Carey-Ann D Burnham; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 4.  Managing Clostridium difficile in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

Authors:  Jana G Hashash; David G Binion
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2014

5.  A Laboratory Medicine Best Practices Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests (NAATs) and Algorithms Including NAATs for the Diagnosis of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile in Adults.

Authors:  Colleen S Kraft; J Scott Parrott; Nancy E Cornish; Matthew L Rubinstein; Alice S Weissfeld; Peggy McNult; Irving Nachamkin; Romney M Humphries; Thomas J Kirn; Jennifer Dien Bard; Joseph D Lutgring; Jonathan C Gullett; Cassiana E Bittencourt; Susan Benson; April M Bobenchik; Robert L Sautter; Vickie Baselski; Michel C Atlas; Elizabeth M Marlowe; Nancy S Miller; Monika Fischer; Sandra S Richter; Peter Gilligan; James W Snyder
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 6.  Acute severe ulcerative colitis: management advice for internal medicine and emergency physicians.

Authors:  Konstantina Rosiou; Christian Philipp Selinger
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 3.397

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.