Literature DB >> 22852779

Polyfunctional ionogenic compound sorption: challenges and new approaches to advance predictive models.

Allison A MacKay1, Dharni Vasudevan.   

Abstract

Polyfunctional ionogenic compounds are unique in that they sorb to environmental solids at multiple receptor sites via multiple interaction mechanisms. However, existing sorption models fail to accommodate: (i) sorption via a single mechanism (e.g., cation exchange) at one sorbent receptor site type (e.g., exchange site) distributed across multiple soil components (e.g., organic matter and aluminosilicates); and (ii) sorption at a specific sorbent receptor site (e.g., exchange site) involving distinct sorbate structural moieties (e.g., -NH(3)(+) and -COOH) and distinct interaction mechanisms (e.g., cation exchange and cation bridging). In response, this study offers a mechanism-based framework for conceptualizing the equilibrium solid-water sorption coefficient, K(d), with particular emphasis on the mechanisms of cation exchange and surface complexation/cation bridging. The unique mapping of sorbate structural moieties, sorbent receptor sites, and sorption mechanisms is used to advance mechanism-specific probe compounds for cation exchange and surface complexation/cation bridging for quantifying the relevant site abundance and baseline sorption free energy. Existing literature studies point to the feasibility of developing mechanism-specific structural corrections to "adjust" mechanism-specific probe sorption measures to estimate the magnitude of sorption for any polyfunctional ionogenic compound of interest. Advancement of our conceptual framework to a quantitative K(d) model requires more extensive evaluation of ionogenic compound sorption under consistent experimental conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22852779     DOI: 10.1021/es301036t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  6 in total

1.  Removal mechanisms for extremely high-level fluoroquinolone antibiotics in pharmaceutical wastewater treatment plants.

Authors:  Xinyan Guo; Zheng Yan; Yi Zhang; Xiangji Kong; Deyang Kong; Zhengjun Shan; Na Wang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Temporal and spatial behavior of pharmaceuticals in Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island, United States.

Authors:  Mark G Cantwell; David R Katz; Julia C Sullivan; Kay Ho; Robert M Burgess
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.742

3.  Sorption of sulfisoxazole onto soil--an insight into different influencing factors.

Authors:  Joanna Maszkowska; Anna Białk-Bielińska; Katarzyna Mioduszewska; Marta Wagil; Jolanta Kumirska; Piotr Stepnowski
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Sorption of thiabendazole in sub-tropical Brazilian soils.

Authors:  Odilon França de Oliveira Neto; Alejandro Yopasa Arenas; Anne Hélène Fostier
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Sorption and Mobility of Charged Organic Compounds: How to Confront and Overcome Limitations in Their Assessment.

Authors:  Gabriel Sigmund; Hans Peter H Arp; Benedikt M Aumeier; Thomas D Bucheli; Benny Chefetz; Wei Chen; Steven T J Droge; Satoshi Endo; Beate I Escher; Sarah E Hale; Thilo Hofmann; Joseph Pignatello; Thorsten Reemtsma; Torsten C Schmidt; Carina D Schönsee; Martin Scheringer
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 11.357

6.  Insight into the Sorption of 5-Fluorouracil and Methotrexate onto Soil-pH, Ionic Strength, and Co-Contaminant Influence.

Authors:  Katarzyna Markiewicz; Anna Białk-Bielińska; Paulina Łukaszewicz; Piotr Stepnowski; Joanna Dołżonek
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 4.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.