Literature DB >> 22852456

Social values and healthcare priority setting in Korea.

Jeonghoon Ahn1, Gaeun Kim, Hae Sun Suh, Sang Moo Lee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to present the role of social values in setting healthcare priorities in Korea. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Using Clark and Weale's draft framework, Korean healthcare priority setting was analysed. The process values used were transparency, accountability, and participation, and the content values used were clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness, justice/equity, solidarity and autonomy.
FINDINGS: In the Korean health priority setting, it was found that multiple factors influence the decision-making process. Effectiveness and safety are the two most important values mentioned in the process. Cost-effectiveness is also considered in reimbursement decisions for new drugs since 2007. Recently, health technology assessment (HTA) has begun to change the social value system traditionally used in the Korean healthcare priority setting. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: The paper extends understanding of health priority setting in Korea, and how the interpretation and use of social values has changed over recent years.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22852456     DOI: 10.1108/14777261211238981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Organ Manag        ISSN: 1477-7266


  9 in total

1.  Organizational values in the provision of access to care for the uninsured.

Authors:  Krista Lyn Harrison; Holly A Taylor
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2016-03-30

Review 2.  Burden of Disease Study and Priority Setting in Korea: an Ethical Perspective.

Authors:  So Youn Park; Ivo Kwon; In Hwan Oh
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.153

3.  Healthcare resource allocation decisions affecting uninsured services.

Authors:  Krista Lyn Harrison; Holly A Taylor
Journal:  J Health Organ Manag       Date:  2016-11-21

Review 4.  A systematic review on current status of health technology reassessment: insights for South Korea.

Authors:  Hyun-Ju Seo; Ji Jeong Park; Seon Heui Lee
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2016-11-11

5.  Health Technology Assessment: Global Advocacy and Local Realities Comment on "Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage: We Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes, Not Just More Evidence on Cost-Effectiveness".

Authors:  Kalipso Chalkidou; Ryan Li; Anthony J Culyer; Amanda Glassman; Karen J Hofman; Yot Teerawattananon
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2017-04-01

6.  Creating sustainable health care systems.

Authors:  Peter Littlejohns; Katharina Kieslich; Albert Weale; Emma Tumilty; Georgina Richardson; Tim Stokes; Robin Gauld; Paul Scuffham
Journal:  J Health Organ Manag       Date:  2018-11-22

7.  Describing practices of priority setting and resource allocation in publicly funded health care systems of high-income countries.

Authors:  Brayan V Seixas; Dean A Regier; Stirling Bryan; Craig Mitton
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  The Value Framework Governing Iran's Health System Policy: A Practical Gap.

Authors:  Lida Shams; Shahram Yazdani; Taha Nasiri
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2022-06-24

9.  Social values and health systems in health policy and systems research: a mixed-method systematic review and evidence map.

Authors:  Eleanor Whyle; Jill Olivier
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.344

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.