Literature DB >> 22852452

Social values and health policy: a new international research programme.

Peter Littlejohns, Albert Weale, Kalipso Chalkidou, Ruth Faden, Yot Teerawattananon.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This editorial aims to outline the context of healthcare priority-setting, and summarise each of the other ten papers in this special edition. It introduces a new multidisciplinary research programme drawing on ethics, philosophy, health economics, political science and health technology assessment, out of which the papers in this edition have arisen. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Key normative concepts are introduced and policy and research context provided to frame subsequent papers in the edition.
FINDINGS: Common challenges of health priority-setting are faced by many countries across the world, and a range of social value judgments is in play as resource allocation decisions are made. Although the challenges faced by different countries are in many ways similar, the way in which social values affect the processes and content of priority-setting decisions means that those challenges are resolved very differently in a variety of social, political, cultural and institutional settings, as subsequent papers in this edition demonstrate. How social values affect decision making in this way is the subject of a new multi-disciplinary research programme. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: Technical analyses of health priority setting are commonplace, but approaching the issues from the perspective of social values and conducting comparative analyses across countries with very different cultural, social and institutional contexts provides the content for a new research agenda.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22852452     DOI: 10.1108/14777261211238945

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Organ Manag        ISSN: 1477-7266


  14 in total

1.  Incorporating cost-effectiveness data in a fair process for priority setting efforts Comment on "Use of cost-effectiveness data in priority setting decisions: experiences from the national guidelines for heart diseases in Sweden".

Authors:  Sitaporn Youngkong
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2015-04-11

2.  Organizational values in the provision of access to care for the uninsured.

Authors:  Krista Lyn Harrison; Holly A Taylor
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2016-03-30

Review 3.  A systematic review of stated preference studies reporting public preferences for healthcare priority setting.

Authors:  Jennifer A Whitty; Emily Lancsar; Kylie Rixon; Xanthe Golenko; Julie Ratcliffe
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  Exploring the perspectives and preferences for HTA across German healthcare stakeholders using a multi-criteria assessment of a pulmonary heart sensor as a case study.

Authors:  Philip Wahlster; Mireille Goetghebeur; Sandra Schaller; Christine Kriza; Peter Kolominsky-Rabas
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2015-04-28

5.  Public preferences for engagement in Health Technology Assessment decision-making: protocol of a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Sally Wortley; Allison Tong; Emily Lancsar; Glenn Salkeld; Kirsten Howard
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 2.796

6.  Creating sustainable health care systems.

Authors:  Peter Littlejohns; Katharina Kieslich; Albert Weale; Emma Tumilty; Georgina Richardson; Tim Stokes; Robin Gauld; Paul Scuffham
Journal:  J Health Organ Manag       Date:  2018-11-22

7.  Health technology assessments as a mechanism for increased value for money: recommendations to the Global Fund.

Authors:  Yot Teerawattananon; Kate McQueston; Amanda Glassman; Jomkwan Yothasamut; Chaw Yin Myint
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 4.185

8.  Preferences for engagement in health technology assessment decision-making: a nominal group technique with members of the public.

Authors:  Sally Wortley; Allison Tong; Kirsten Howard
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Integrating public preferences into national reimbursement decisions: a descriptive comparison of approaches in Belgium and New Zealand.

Authors:  Christine Leopold; Christine Y Lu; Anita K Wagner
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Guidance on priority setting in health care (GPS-Health): the inclusion of equity criteria not captured by cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Ole F Norheim; Rob Baltussen; Mira Johri; Dan Chisholm; Erik Nord; DanW Brock; Per Carlsson; Richard Cookson; Norman Daniels; Marion Danis; Marc Fleurbaey; Kjell A Johansson; Lydia Kapiriri; Peter Littlejohns; Thomas Mbeeli; Krishna D Rao; Tessa Tan-Torres Edejer; Dan Wikler
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2014-08-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.