Literature DB >> 22851903

Prevalence and indications for video recording in the health care setting in North American and British paediatric hospitals.

Katherine Taylor1, Antonia Mayell, Stephanie Vandenberg, Nadeene Blanchard, Christopher S Parshuram.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Health care video recording has demonstrated value in education, performance assessment, quality improvement and clinical care.
METHODS: A survey was administered to paediatric hospitals in Great Britain, Canada and the United States. Heads of departments or delegates from six areas (emergency departments [EDs], operating rooms, paediatric intensive care units [PICUs], neonatal intensive care units [NICUs], simulation centres and neuroepilepsy units) were asked 10 questions about the prevalence, indications and process issues of video recording.
RESULTS: Seventy hospitals were surveyed, totalling 307 clinical areas. The hospital response rate was 100%; the rate for clinical departments was 65%. Sixty-six hospitals (94%) currently use video recording. Video recording was used in 62 of 68 (91%) operating rooms; 36 of 69 (52%) PICUs; 35 of 67 (52%) NICUs; 12 of 65 (19%) EDs; seven of eight (88%) neuroepilepsy units and 13 of 14 (93%) simulation centres. Education was the most common indication (112 of 204 [55%]). Most sites obtained written consent. Since the introduction of more strict privacy legislation, 11 of 65 (17%) EDs have discontinued video recording.
CONCLUSION: The present study describes video recording practices in paediatric hospitals in North America and Great Britain. Video recording is primarily used for education and most areas have a consent process.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Education; Medical; Paediatrics; Video recording

Year:  2011        PMID: 22851903      PMCID: PMC3200398          DOI: 10.1093/pch/16.7.e57

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Child Health        ISSN: 1205-7088            Impact factor:   2.253


  17 in total

1.  Do not roll the videotape: effects of the health insurance portability and accountability act and the law on trauma videotaping practices.

Authors:  Shannelle Campbell; Julie Ann Sosa; Reuven Rabinovici; Heidi Frankel
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Practices and provisions for parents sleeping overnight with a hospitalized child.

Authors:  Robyn Stremler; Lily Wong; Christopher Parshuram
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2007-09-28

3.  A novel approach to high definition, high-contrast video capture in abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Peter H Cosman; Christopher J Shearer; Thomas J Hugh; Andrew V Biankin; Neil D Merrett
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Parental attitudes to digital recording: A paediatric hospital survey.

Authors:  Katherine Taylor; Stephanie Vandenberg; Ariel le Huquet; Nadeene Blanchard; Christopher S Parshuram
Journal:  J Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.954

5.  A multi-state survey of videotaping practices for major trauma resuscitations.

Authors:  D G Ellis; E B Lerner; D V Jehle; K Romano; C Siffring
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.484

6.  A cross-sectional survey of levels of care and response mechanisms for evolving critical illness in hospitalized children.

Authors:  Stephanie D VandenBerg; Jamie S Hutchison; Christopher S Parshuram
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2007-03-26       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 7.  Informed consent: what is it? Who can give it? How do we improve it?

Authors:  Margaret J Neff
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.258

Review 8.  Beyond informed consent: educating the patient.

Authors:  Lawrence H Brenner; Alison Tytell Brenner; Daniel Horowitz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Using video recording to identify management errors in pediatric trauma resuscitation.

Authors:  Ed Oakley; Sergio Stocker; Georg Staubli; Simon Young
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 10.  From Hippocrates to HIPAA: privacy and confidentiality in emergency medicine--Part I: conceptual, moral, and legal foundations.

Authors:  John C Moskop; Catherine A Marco; Gregory Luke Larkin; Joel M Geiderman; Arthur R Derse
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.721

View more
  6 in total

1.  Observing movement disorders: best practice proposal in the use of video recording in clinical practice.

Authors:  Luisa Sambati; Luca Baldelli; Giovanna Calandra Buonaura; Sabina Capellari; Giulia Giannini; Cesa Lorella Maria Scaglione; Massimo Armaroli; Elena Zoni; Pietro Cortelli; Paolo Martinelli
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 3.307

2.  Research: Acceptability, Feasibility, and Cost of Using Video to Evaluate Alarm Fatigue.

Authors:  Matt MacMurchy; Shannon Stemler; Mimi Zander; Christopher P Bonafide
Journal:  Biomed Instrum Technol       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb

3.  Provider Perspective on Being Recorded During Emergency Medicine Discharge Conversations.

Authors:  Nickolas Meier; Andrew Little; Teresita Morales-Yurik; Brandon Arehart
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-27

Review 4.  Legal perspectives on black box recording devices in the operating environment.

Authors:  A S H M van Dalen; J Legemaate; W S Schlack; D A Legemate; M P Schijven
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  The Clinical Value of Patient Home Videos in Movement Disorders.

Authors:  Andrew Billnitzer; Joseph Jankovic
Journal:  Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y)       Date:  2021-09-21

6.  Is perception of quality more important than technical quality in patient video cases?

Authors:  Damian Roland; David Matheson; Nick Taub; Tim Coats; Monica Lakhanpaul
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 2.463

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.