Literature DB >> 22851865

Assessment of the validity of the clinical pathway for colon endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Takaya Aoki1, Takeshi Nakajima, Yutaka Saito, Takahisa Matsuda, Taku Sakamoto, Takao Itoi, Yassir Khiyar, Fuminori Moriyasu.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine the effective hospitalization period as the clinical pathway to prepare patients for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).
METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study which included 189 patients consecutively treated by ESD at the National Cancer Center Hospital from May 2007 to March 2009. Patients were divided into 2 groups; patients in group A were discharged in 5 d and patients in group B included those who stayed longer than 5 d. The following data were collected for both groups: mean hospitalization period, tumor site, median tumor size, post-ESD rectal bleeding requiring urgent endoscopy, perforation during or after ESD, abdominal pain, fever above 38  °C, and blood test results positive for inflammatory markers before and after ESD. Each parameter was compared after data collection.
RESULTS: A total of 83% (156/189) of all patients could be discharged from the hospital on day 3 post-ESD. Complications were observed in 12.1% (23/189) of patients. Perforation occurred in 3.7% (7/189) of patients. All the perforations occurred during the ESD procedure and they were managed with endoscopic clipping. The incidence of post-operative bleeding was 2.6% (5/189); all the cases involved rectal bleeding. We divided the subjects into 2 groups: tumor diameter ≥ 4 cm and < 4 cm; there was no significant difference between the 2 groups (P = 0.93, χ² test with Yates correction). The incidence of abdominal pain was 3.7% (7/189). All the cases occurred on the day of the procedure or the next day. The median white blood cell count was 6800 ± 2280 (cells/μL; ± SD) for group A, and 7700 ± 2775 (cells/μL; ± SD) for group B, showing a statistically significant difference (P = 0.023, t-test). The mean C-reactive protein values the day after ESD were 0.4 ± 1.3 mg/dL and 0.5 ± 1.3 mg/dL for groups A and B, respectively, with no significant difference between the 2 groups (P = 0.54, t-test).
CONCLUSION: One-day admission is sufficient in the absence of complications during ESD or early post-operative bleeding.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical pathway; Colon; Complication; Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Hospitalization period; Rectum

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22851865      PMCID: PMC3406425          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i28.3721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  23 in total

1.  Prevention of infectious complications subsequent to endoscopic treatment of the colon and rectum.

Authors:  H. Ishikawa; Ikuko Akedo; Takeshi Minami; Yasuhisa Shinomura; Hiromasa Tojo; Toru Otani
Journal:  J Infect Chemother       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.211

2.  Submucosal saline wheal as safety factor in fulguration or rectal and sigmoidal polypi.

Authors:  N ROSENBERG
Journal:  AMA Arch Surg       Date:  1955-01

3.  Endoscopic mucosal resection for treatment of early gastric cancer.

Authors:  H Ono; H Kondo; T Gotoda; K Shirao; H Yamaguchi; D Saito; K Hosokawa; T Shimoda; S Yoshida
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Endoscopic indications for endoscopic mucosal resection of laterally spreading tumours in the colorectum.

Authors:  T Uraoka; Y Saito; T Matsuda; H Ikehara; T Gotoda; D Saito; T Fujii
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-05-08       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 5.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection of early cancers and large flat adenomas.

Authors:  Hironori Yamamoto
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 11.382

6.  Re-engineering pharmaceutical care: towards a patient-focused care approach.

Authors:  W M al-Shaqha; M Zairi
Journal:  Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv       Date:  2000

7.  Clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal tumors as determined by curative resection.

Authors:  Yutaka Saito; Masakatsu Fukuzawa; Takahisa Matsuda; Shusei Fukunaga; Taku Sakamoto; Toshio Uraoka; Takeshi Nakajima; Hisatomo Ikehara; Kuang-I Fu; Takao Itoi; Takahiro Fujii
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Bowel preparation effectiveness: inpatients and outpatients.

Authors:  Elnora Anderson; Joy Don Baker
Journal:  Gastroenterol Nurs       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.978

9.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for colorectal tumors.

Authors:  Yutaka Saito; Taku Sakamoto; Shusei Fukunaga; Takeshi Nakajima; Shinsuke Kiriyama; Shinsuke Kuriyama; Takahisa Matsuda
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 7.559

10.  Success and shortcomings of a clinical care pathway in the management of acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Patrick R Pfau; Gregory S Cooper; Mark D Carlson; Amitabh Chak; Michael V Sivak; Judith A Gonet; Karen K Boyd; Richard C K Wong
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: Recent technical advances for safe and successful procedures.

Authors:  Katsumi Yamamoto; Tomoki Michida; Tsutomu Nishida; Shiro Hayashi; Masafumi Naito; Toshifumi Ito
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-10-10

2.  Short-term Prospective Questionnaire Study of Early Postoperative Quality of Life After Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.

Authors:  Fumihiko Nakamura; Yutaka Saito; Shin Haruyama; Masau Sekiguchi; Masayoshi Yamada; Taku Sakamoto; Takeshi Nakajima; Seiichiro Yamamoto; Yoshitaka Murakami; Hideki Ishikawa; Takahisa Matsuda
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Effectiveness of Surgicel® (Fibrillar) in patients with colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Authors:  Yu Sik Myung; Bong Min Ko; Jae Pil Han; Su Jin Hong; Seong Ran Jeon; Jin Oh Kim; Jong Ho Moon; Moon Sung Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Stenosis rates after endoscopic submucosal dissection of large rectal tumors involving greater than three quarters of the luminal circumference.

Authors:  Seiichiro Abe; Taku Sakamoto; Hiroyuki Takamaru; Masayoshi Yamada; Takeshi Nakajima; Takahisa Matsuda; Yutaka Saito
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Colorectal ESD in day surgery.

Authors:  Tomohiko Ohya; Richard Marsk; Klas Pekkari
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Warning for unprincipled colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: accurate diagnosis and reasonable treatment strategy.

Authors:  Shinji Tanaka; Motomi Terasaki; Nana Hayashi; Shiro Oka; Kazuaki Chayama
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 7.559

7.  Potential perioperative advantage of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection versus laparoscopy-assisted colectomy.

Authors:  Fumihiko Nakamura; Yutaka Saito; Taku Sakamoto; Yosuke Otake; Takeshi Nakajima; Seiichiro Yamamoto; Yoshitaka Murakami; Hideki Ishikawa; Takahisa Matsuda
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-19       Impact factor: 4.584

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.