Literature DB >> 22851824

Comparative Study of Intra-cervical Foley's Catheter and PGE(2) Gel for Pre-induction Ripening (Cervical).

V L Deshmukh1, K A Yelikar, A B Deshmukh.   

Abstract

AIM: The success of induction of labor depends on the cervical status at the time of induction.
OBJECTIVE: For effective cervical ripening both Foley's catheter and PGE(2) gel are used. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of intra cervical Foley's catheter and intra cervical PGE(2) gel in cervical ripening for the successful induction of labor. STUDY
DESIGN: A randomized, prospective study was conducted in the Dept of OBGY, GMCH, Aurangabad from July 2005-January 2008. 400 patients at term with a Bishop's score ≤3 with various indications for induction were randomly allocated to receive (200 pts) intra-cervical Foley's catheter or PGE(2) gel (200 pts). After 6 h post induction, Bishop's score was noted labor was augmented if required. Statistical analysis was done using Chi square test and t test. RESULT: The groups were comparable with respect to maternal age, gestation age, indication of induction and initial Bishop's score. Both the groups showed significant change in the Bishop's score, 5.56 ± 1.89 and 5.49 ± 1.82 for Foley's catheter and PGE(2) gel, respectively, P < 0.001; However there was no significant difference between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the side effects. Twenty eight cesarean sections (14%) were performed in Group A and 37 (18.5%) were performed in Group B (not significant). The induction to delivery interval was 15.32 ± 5.24 h in Group A and 14.2 ± 5.14 h in Group B (P = 0.291). Apgar scores, birth weights and NICU admissions showed no difference between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: This study shows that both Foley's Catheter and PGE(2) gel are equally effective in pre induction cervical ripening.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical ripening; Foley’s catheter; PGE2

Year:  2011        PMID: 22851824      PMCID: PMC3295881          DOI: 10.1007/s13224-011-0063-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India        ISSN: 0975-6434


  2 in total

1.  Preinduction cervical ripening: a comparison of intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel versus the Foley catheter.

Authors:  R D St Onge; G T Connors
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  A prospective, randomized comparison of Foley catheter insertion versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening.

Authors:  A C Sciscione; H McCullough; J S Manley; P A Shlossman; M Pollock; G H Colmorgen
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 8.661

  2 in total
  3 in total

1.  Foley catheter for cervical priming in induction of labour at University Obstetrics Unit, Colombo, Sri Lanka: a clinical audit with a patient satisfaction survey.

Authors:  M Patabendige; A Jayawardane
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2017-04-12

2.  Intracervical Foley catheter balloon versus dinoprostone insert for induction cervical ripening: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Lixia Zhu; Cong Zhang; Fang Cao; Qin Liu; Xing Gu; Jianhao Xu; Jianqing Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 3.  Mechanical methods for induction of labour.

Authors:  Marieke Dt de Vaan; Mieke Lg Ten Eikelder; Marta Jozwiak; Kirsten R Palmer; Miranda Davies-Tuck; Kitty Wm Bloemenkamp; Ben Willem J Mol; Michel Boulvain
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-10-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.