Literature DB >> 22850741

Clinical evaluation of new automated cytomegalovirus IgM and IgG assays for the Elecsys(®) analyser platform.

M G Revello1, C Vauloup-Fellous, L Grangeot-Keros, J van Helden, Y Dickstein, I Lipkin, A Mühlbacher, T Lazzarotto.   

Abstract

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a leading cause of physical and neurological abnormalities in newborns. Hence, the diagnosis of CMV infection in pregnant women is necessary in order to allow appropriate management of their pregnancy. New assays have been developed for the Roche Elecsys® immunoassay platform that detect CMV-specific immunoglobulin (Ig)M and IgG, with the IgM assay designed to target IgM produced at the start of infection rather than IgM persisting later in infection. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the new assays compared with other commercial kits widely distributed in laboratories. The performance of the Elecsys and comparator CMV IgM and IgG assays was assessed using 967 preselected patient samples characterised by CMV infection status, as well as being compared using 1,668 unselected clinical samples. The Elecsys CMV IgM and IgG assays performed consistently with comparator assays using the preselected samples. The Elecsys CMV IgM assay showed improved sensitivity compared with the Enzygnost® assay in primary infection (91.2 % vs. 79.4 %) and improved specificity over the Architect® assay in potentially cross-reacting samples (94.1 % vs. 82.4 %). The Elecsys IgM assay reported fewer positive results in the later stages of CMV infection compared with ETI-CYTOK-M ELISA, while the Elecsys IgG assay reported slightly fewer negative results in the early stages of infection compared with ETI-CYTOK-G ELISA. There was good agreement between Elecsys and comparator assays using unselected clinical samples (range 90.4-99.4 %). The Elecsys CMV IgM and IgG assays compare well with routinely used assays and are suitable for clinical use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22850741     DOI: 10.1007/s10096-012-1700-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  32 in total

1.  Measurement of the sensitivity of different commercial assays in the diagnosis of CMV infection in pregnancy.

Authors:  M Gentile; C Galli; P Pagnotti; P Di Marco; S Tzantzoglou; F Bellomi; M L Ferreri; C Selvaggi; G Antonelli
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Antibody response to cytomegalovirus after renal transplantation: comparison of patients with primary and recurrent infections.

Authors:  R F Pass; P D Griffiths; A M August
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 5.226

3.  Antigenic cross-reactions among herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2, Epstein-Barr virus, and cytomegalovirus.

Authors:  N Balachandran; D E Oba; L M Hutt-Fletcher
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 5.103

4.  Evaluation of the Abbott AxSYM cytomegalovirus (CMV) immunoglobulin M (IgM) assay in conjunction with other CMV IgM tests and a CMV IgG avidity assay.

Authors:  T Lazzarotto; C Galli; R Pulvirenti; R Rescaldani; R Vezzo; A La Gioia; C Martinelli; S La Rocca; G Agresti; L Grillner; M Nordin; M van Ranst; B Combs; G T Maine; M P Landini
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2001-01

Review 5.  Congenital and perinatal cytomegalovirus infections.

Authors:  C A Alford; S Stagno; R F Pass; W J Britt
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct

6.  Increased risk of cytomegalovirus transmission in utero during late gestation.

Authors:  M Bodéus; C Hubinont; P Goubau
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  IgM antibody detection of ppUL80A and ppUL32 by immunoblotting: an early parameter for recurrent cytomegalovirus infection in renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  Y J Kraat; F S Stals; M H Christiaans; T Lazzarotto; M P Landini; C A Bruggeman
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.327

8.  Maternal, fetal and neonatal diagnosis of congenital human cytomegalovirus infection.

Authors:  Maria Grazia Revello; Giuseppe Gerna
Journal:  Expert Opin Med Diagn       Date:  2008-05

9.  Cytomegalovirus strain diversity in seropositive women.

Authors:  Zdenek Novak; Shannon A Ross; Raj Kumar Patro; Sunil Kumar Pati; Rekha A Kumbla; Sallie Brice; Suresh B Boppana
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Evaluation of the new architect cytomegalovirus immunoglobulin M (IgM), IgG, and IgG avidity assays.

Authors:  K Lagrou; M Bodeus; M Van Ranst; P Goubau
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Performance of Zika Assays in the Context of Toxoplasma gondii, Parvovirus B19, Rubella Virus, and Cytomegalovirus (TORCH) Diagnostic Assays.

Authors:  Bettie Voordouw; Barry Rockx; Thomas Jaenisch; Pieter Fraaij; Philippe Mayaud; Ann Vossen; Marion Koopmans
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Detection of Cytomegalovirus Antibodies Using a Biosensor Based on Imaging Ellipsometry.

Authors:  Hongliu Sun; Cai Qi; Yu Niu; Tengfei Kang; Yongxin Wei; Gang Jin; Xianzhi Dong; Chunhua Wang; Wei Zhu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Pitfalls in the Serological Evaluation of Maternal Cytomegalovirus Infection as a Potential Cause of Fetal and Neonatal Involvements: A Narrative Literature Review.

Authors:  Shigeo Iijima
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Hygiene promotion might be better than serological screening to deal with Cytomegalovirus infection during pregnancy: a methodological appraisal and decision analysis.

Authors:  Agathe Billette de Villemeur; Pierre Tattevin; Louis-Rachid Salmi
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 3.090

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.