Literature DB >> 22850565

A long-term prospective population pharmacokinetic study on imatinib plasma concentrations in GIST patients.

Karel Eechoute1, Martin N Fransson, An K Reyners, Floris A de Jong, Alex Sparreboom, Winette T A van der Graaf, Lena E Friberg, Gaia Schiavon, Erik A C Wiemer, Jaap Verweij, Walter J Loos, Ron H J Mathijssen, Ugo De Giorgi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Imatinib minimal (trough) plasma concentrations after one month of treatment have shown a significant association with clinical benefit in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Considering that a retrospective pharmacokinetic analysis has also suggested that imatinib clearance increases over time in patients with soft tissue sarcoma and GIST, the primary aim of this study was to assess systemic exposure to imatinib at multiple time points in a long-term prospective population pharmacokinetic study. As imatinib is mainly metabolized in the liver, our secondary aim was to elucidate the potential effects of the volume of liver metastases on exposure to imatinib. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Full pharmacokinetic blood sampling was conducted in 50 patients with GIST on the first day of imatinib treatment, and after one, six, and 12 months. In addition, on day 14, and monthly during imatinib treatment, trough samples were taken. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using a compartmental model. Volume of liver metastases was assessed by computed tomographic (CT) imaging.
RESULTS: After 90 days of treatment, a significant decrease in imatinib systemic exposure of 29.3% compared with baseline was observed (P < 0.01). For every 100 cm(3) increase of metastatic volume, a predicted decrease of 3.8% in imatinib clearance was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first prospective pharmacokinetic study in patients with GIST, showing a significant decrease of approximately 30% in imatinib exposure after long-term treatment. This means that future "trough level - clinical benefit" analyses should be time point specific. GIST liver involvement, however, has a marginal effect on imatinib clearance. ©2012 AACR

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22850565     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-0490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  36 in total

1.  Imatinib Pharmacokinetics in a Large Observational Cohort of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumour Patients.

Authors:  Sheima Farag; Remy B Verheijen; J Martijn Kerst; Annemiek Cats; Alwin D R Huitema; Neeltje Steeghs
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Effect of Adherence on Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Relationships of Oral Targeted Anticancer Drugs.

Authors:  Evelina Cardoso; Chantal Csajka; Marie P Schneider; Nicolas Widmer
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Human hepatocyte assessment of imatinib drug-drug interactions - complexities in clinical translation.

Authors:  Jan H Beumer; Venkateswaran C Pillai; Robert A Parise; Susan M Christner; Brian F Kiesel; Michelle A Rudek; Raman Venkataramanan
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Optimizing the dose in cancer patients treated with imatinib, sunitinib and pazopanib.

Authors:  Nienke A G Lankheet; Ingrid M E Desar; Sasja F Mulder; David M Burger; Dinemarie M Kweekel; Carla M L van Herpen; Winette T A van der Graaf; Nielka P van Erp
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 5.  Practical guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring of anticancer tyrosine kinase inhibitors: focus on the pharmacokinetic targets.

Authors:  Huixin Yu; Neeltje Steeghs; Cynthia M Nijenhuis; Jan H M Schellens; Jos H Beijnen; Alwin D R Huitema
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 6.  Determining the optimal dose in the development of anticancer agents.

Authors:  Ron H J Mathijssen; Alex Sparreboom; Jaap Verweij
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 7.  How 'Optimal' are Optimal Sampling Times for Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Cancer? Practical Considerations.

Authors:  Michael B Ward; Stephanie E Reuter; Jennifer H Martin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Development of a Pharmacokinetic Model to Describe the Complex Pharmacokinetics of Pazopanib in Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Huixin Yu; Nielka van Erp; Sander Bins; Ron H J Mathijssen; Jan H M Schellens; Jos H Beijnen; Neeltje Steeghs; Alwin D R Huitema
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 9.  Cancer pharmacogenomics: early promise, but concerted effort needed.

Authors:  Howard L McLeod
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 10.  Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Markers For Anti-angiogenic Cancer Therapy: Implications for Dosing and Selection of Patients.

Authors:  Matteo Morotti; Prashanth Hari Dass; Adrian L Harris; Simon Lord
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.441

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.