BACKGROUND: Functional neuroimaging studies have suggested similar mechanisms underlying antidepressant effects of distinct therapeutics. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine and compare functional brain patterns underlying the antidepressant response of 2 distinct protocols of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). METHODS:99mTc-ECD SPECT was performed before and after rTMS of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in 61 drug-resistant right-handed patients with major depression, using high frequency (10Hz) left-side stimulation in 33 patients, and low frequency (1Hz) right-side stimulation in 28 patients. Efficiency of rTMS response was defined as at least 50% reduction of the baseline Beck Depression Inventory score. We compared the whole-brain voxel-based brain SPECT changes in perfusion after rTMS, between responders and non-responders in the whole sample (p<0.005, uncorrected), and separately in the subgroup of patients with left- and right-stimulation. RESULTS: Before rTMS, the left- and right-prefrontal stimulation groups did not differ from clinical data and brain SPECT perfusion. rTMS efficiency (evaluated on % of responders) was statistically equivalent in the two groups of patients. In the whole-group of responder patients, a perfusion decrease was found after rTMS, in comparison to non-responders, within the left perirhinal cortex (BA35, BA36). This result was secondarily confirmed separately in the two subgroups, i.e. after either left stimulation (p=0.017) or right stimulation (p<0.001), without significant perfusion differences between these two subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that distinct successful rTMS protocols induce equivalent brain functional changes associated to antidepressive efficiency, consisting to a remote brain limbic activity decrease within the left perirhinal cortex. However, these results will have to be confirmed in a double-blind randomized trial using a sham control group.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Functional neuroimaging studies have suggested similar mechanisms underlying antidepressant effects of distinct therapeutics. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine and compare functional brain patterns underlying the antidepressant response of 2 distinct protocols of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). METHODS: 99mTc-ECD SPECT was performed before and after rTMS of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in 61 drug-resistant right-handed patients with major depression, using high frequency (10Hz) left-side stimulation in 33 patients, and low frequency (1Hz) right-side stimulation in 28 patients. Efficiency of rTMS response was defined as at least 50% reduction of the baseline Beck Depression Inventory score. We compared the whole-brain voxel-based brain SPECT changes in perfusion after rTMS, between responders and non-responders in the whole sample (p<0.005, uncorrected), and separately in the subgroup of patients with left- and right-stimulation. RESULTS: Before rTMS, the left- and right-prefrontal stimulation groups did not differ from clinical data and brain SPECT perfusion. rTMS efficiency (evaluated on % of responders) was statistically equivalent in the two groups of patients. In the whole-group of responder patients, a perfusion decrease was found after rTMS, in comparison to non-responders, within the left perirhinal cortex (BA35, BA36). This result was secondarily confirmed separately in the two subgroups, i.e. after either left stimulation (p=0.017) or right stimulation (p<0.001), without significant perfusion differences between these two subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that distinct successful rTMS protocols induce equivalent brain functional changes associated to antidepressive efficiency, consisting to a remote brain limbic activity decrease within the left perirhinal cortex. However, these results will have to be confirmed in a double-blind randomized trial using a sham control group.
Authors: Laura E Leggett; Lesley J J Soril; Stephanie Coward; Diane L Lorenzetti; Gail MacKean; Fiona M Clement Journal: Prim Care Companion CNS Disord Date: 2015-11-05
Authors: Jennifer G. Levitt; Guldamla Kalender; Joseph O’Neill; Joel P. Diaz; Ian A. Cook; Nathaniel Ginder; David Krantz; Michael J. Minzenberg; Nikita Vince-Cruz; Lydia D. Nguyen; Jeffry R. Alger; Andrew F. Leuchter Journal: J Psychiatry Neurosci Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 6.186
Authors: Jose Antonio Camacho-Conde; Maria Del Rosario Gonzalez-Bermudez; Marta Carretero-Rey; Zafar U Khan Journal: CNS Neurosci Ther Date: 2021-12-03 Impact factor: 5.243