Literature DB >> 22850068

Effects of participation vs. observation of a simulation experience on testing outcomes: implications for logistical planning for a school of nursing.

Barbara G Kaplan1, Corrine Abraham, Rebecca Gary.   

Abstract

The simulation program within our nursing curriculum covers a wide array of content areas and has been rated very highly by students and faculty. Due to this success, requests for increased simulation experiences have grown dramatically. The challenge lies, however, in logistically accommodating large student groups in finite periods of time. To overcome these constraints, an alternative plan was devised where half of the students actively participate in the simulation while their cohort observes. Both groups participate in the debriefing process. Findings revealed no significant differences (p=.97) between the simulation and observational groups on scoring of the test items related to this content (n=92). Over 70% reported the simulation experience as enjoyable, well-organized, clarified issues, increased knowledge and prepared them to work in a hospital. These findings indicate that the use of this alternate plan was effective for student learning and could therefore be incorporated into the simulation program design.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22850068     DOI: 10.1515/1548-923X.2398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh        ISSN: 1548-923X


  8 in total

1.  Interprofessional Simulation Olympics as a platform to assess team work knowledge acquisition.

Authors:  Jill Steiner Sanko; Ilya Shekhter; Mary Mckay; Karina Gattamorta; David J Birnbach
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2015-07-02

2.  Impact of Pharmacy Student Observation Versus Active Participation in an Interprofessional Simulation.

Authors:  Nicholas M Fusco; Kelly Foltz-Ramos
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Palliative care in the emergency department: an educational investigation and intervention.

Authors:  Jessica M Goldonowicz; Michael S Runyon; Mark J Bullard
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 3.234

4.  Teaching the Evaluation of Female Pelvic Pain: A Hands-On Simulation to Reinforce Exam Skills and Introduce Transvaginal Ultrasound.

Authors:  Jennifer Pearson; Amy Greminger; Emily Onello; Sandy Stover
Journal:  MedEdPORTAL       Date:  2021-01-25

5.  Comparison of In-Person and Telesimulation for Critical Care Training during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Erica Lin; Alan X You; Gabriel Wardi
Journal:  ATS Sch       Date:  2021-10-29

6.  A Mixed-methods Comparison of Participant and Observer Learner Roles in Simulation Education.

Authors:  Mark J Bullard; Anthony J Weekes; Randolph J Cordle; Sean M Fox; Catherine M Wares; Alan C Heffner; Lisa D Howley; Deborah Navedo
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2018-12-21

7.  Observer roles that optimise learning in healthcare simulation education: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stephanie O'Regan; Elizabeth Molloy; Leonie Watterson; Debra Nestel
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2016-01-11

8.  The Impact of a New Pedagogical Intervention on Nursing Students' Knowledge Acquisition in Simulation-Based Learning: A Quasi-Experimental Study.

Authors:  Thor Arne Haukedal; Inger Åse Reierson; Hanne Hedeman; Ida Torunn Bjørk
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2018-10-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.