Literature DB >> 22849817

Early angiographic embolization is more effective than delayed angiographic embolization in patients with duodenal ulcer bleeding.

Seok Lee1, Sang Wook Kim, Jin Chang Moon, Ji Won Jang, Heyoung Il Kim, Won Seok Park, Byung Jun Jeon, Ji Youn Sohn, Seong Hun Kim, In Hee Kim, Seung Ok Lee, Soo Teik Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Though angiographic embolization (AE) is a type of effective treatment modality for duodenal ulcer bleeding, the optimum time at which to perform the procedure, early or delayed, is unknown. The authors compared the prognosis of early AE (EAE) and delayed AE (DAE) in patients with duodenal ulcer bleeding.
METHODS: A total of 54 patients with duodenal ulcer bleeding were evaluated with first-look endoscopy followed by AE. The patients were divided into two groups, the EAE group and DAE group, according to endoscopic attempts to stop the bleeding during the first-look endoscopy.
RESULTS: The success rate of AE, rebleeding rate, and number of patients who underwent surgery was not significantly different between the EAE group and DAE group (91.3% vs 93.5%, 21.7% vs 29.0% and 4.3% vs 16.1%, respectively; P > 0.05). With respect to death and intensive care unit (ICU) care rate, multivariate analysis showed more favorable results in the EAE group (0% vs 22.6%, P = 0.016 and 4.3% vs 57.4%, P = 0.003, respectively). Multivariate analysis also showed that prolonged prothrombin time (PT) > 1.2 international normalized ratio and the endoscopic attempt were independent factors associated with ICU care.
CONCLUSION: When the AE was performed early with correction for prolonged PT, the patients with duodenal ulcer bleeding had a more favorable prognosis.
© 2012 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22849817     DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2012.07239.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0815-9319            Impact factor:   4.029


  2 in total

1.  Development and validation of a model to predict rebleeding within three days after endoscopic hemostasis for high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding.

Authors:  Yongkang Lai; Yuling Xu; Zhenhua Zhu; Xiaolin Pan; Shunhua Long; Wangdi Liao; Bimin Li; Yin Zhu; Youxiang Chen; Xu Shu
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Gastroduodenal artery embolization for peptic ulcer hemorrhage refractory to endoscopic intervention: A single-center experience.

Authors:  Zain M Khazi; Jasraj Marjara; Michael Nance; Yezaz Ghouri; Ghassan Hammoud; Ryan Davis; Ambarish Bhat
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2022-06-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.