| Literature DB >> 22848785 |
Rodrigo Luiz Perroni Ferraresso1, Renato Buscariolli de Oliveira, Denise Vaz Macedo, Lázaro Alessandro Soares Nunes, René Brenzikofer, Danilo Damas, Rodrigo Hohl.
Abstract
Severe endurance training (overtraining) may cause underperformance related to muscle oxidative stress and cardiomyocyte alterations. Currently, such relationship has not been empirically established. In this study, Wistar rats (n = 19) underwent eight weeks of daily exercise sessions followed by three overtraining weeks in which the daily frequency of exercise sessions increased. After the 11th training week, eight rats exhibited a reduction of 38% in performance (nonfunctional overreaching group (NFOR)), whereas eleven rats exhibited an increase of 18% in performance (functional overreaching group (FOR)). The red gastrocnemius of NFOR presented significantly lower citrate synthase activity compared to FOR, but similar to that of the control. The activity of mitochondrial complex IV in NFOR was lower than that of the control and FOR. This impaired mitochondrial adaptation in NFOR was associated with increased antioxidant enzyme activities and increased lipid peroxidation (in muscle and plasma) relative to FOR and control. Cardiomyocyte apoptosis was higher in NFOR. Plasma creatine kinase levels were unchanged. We observed that some rats that presented evidence of muscle oxidative stress are also subject to cardiomyocyte apoptosis under endurance overtraining. Blood lipid peroxides may be a suitable biomarker for muscle oxidative stress that is unrelated to severe muscle damage.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22848785 PMCID: PMC3403087 DOI: 10.1155/2012/935483
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev ISSN: 1942-0994 Impact factor: 6.543
Training Protocol.
| Experimental weeks | Training phases | Test number | Training speed (m/min) | Training time (min) | Number of daily sessions | Recovery between training sessions (h) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acclimatization | T1 | (—) | (—) | (—) | (—) | |
| 1st | AT1 | no tests | 15 | 20 | 1 | 24 |
| 2sd | AT1 | no tests | 20 | 30 | 1 | 24 |
| 3th | AT1 | no tests | 22,5 | 45 | 1 | 24 |
| 4th | AT1 | T2 | 25 | 60 | 1 | 24 |
| 5th to 7th | AT2 | no tests | 25 | 60 | 1 | 24 |
| 8th | AT2 | T3 | 25 | 60 | 1 | 24 |
| 9th | T2x | T4 | 25 | 60 | 2 | 4 |
| 10th | T3x | T5 | 25 | 60 | 3 | 3 |
| 11th | T4x | T6 | 25 | 60 | 4 | 2 |
AT1: adaptative training 1. AT2: adaptative training 2. T2x, T3x, T4x: training week w/2, 3, and 4 daily sessions.
Figure 1Histogram of the Pr slopes of the NFOR (n = 8) and FOR (n = 11) groups.
Figure 2Performances of the CO (n = 9), FOR (n = 11) and NFOR (n = 8) groups in the six performance tests during the 11-week running training protocol (means ± SD). *Significant difference of the FOR and NFOR groups relative to the CO group (P < 0.001). **Significant difference between test 6 and test 5 in the paired analysis of FOR and NFOR groups (P < 0.01 for FOR and P < 0.001 for NFOR). #Significant difference of the FOR group relative to the NFOR and CO groups (P < 0.001).
Figure 3Activity of antioxidant enzymes and concentration of TBARS in heart and skeletal muscle tissue (means ± SD). Comparisons were made between groups within the same tissue (muscle or heart) and between muscle and heart of the CO group. CO (n = 9), FOR (n = 11), and NFOR (n = 8). (a) SOD: *difference with FOR (P < 0.05) and CO (P < 0.001); **difference with FOR and CO (P < 0.001). (b) Catalase: *difference with FOR (P < 0.05); **difference with FOR and CO (P < 0.001); #difference with CO heart (P < 0.001). (c) GR: *difference with FOR (P < 0.05) and CO (P < 0.01); **difference with CO (P < 0.001); #difference with CO heart (P < 0.001). (d) TBARS: *difference with FOR and CO (P < 0.001); #difference with CO heart (P < 0.01).
Citrate synthase activity and specific activity (as arbitrary units) of complex I/V and IV/V in BN-PAGE gels.
|
|
CO (n = 8). FOR (n = 8). NFOR (n = 8). *Significantly different from CO and NFOR (P < 0.05). **Significantly different from CO and NFOR (P < 0.001). Bands representing the histochemical staining of complexes I and IV and the protein content of complex V (Coomassie Blue G-250). Means ± SD.
Heart morphometric analysis.
| CO | FOR | NFOR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cellular area | ( | 184.30 ± 70.72 | 220.85 ± 59.39* | 204.04 ± 55.64* |
| Collagen | (%) | 1.43 ± 1.16 | 1.56 ± 1.42 | 1.38 ± 1.49 |
| Heart mass | (mg) | 1196.70 ± 140.57 | 1198.43 ± 105.89 | 1203.18 ± 111.60 |
| Body mass | (g) | 416.20 ± 41.14 | 366.89 ± 24.12* | 370.29 ± 33.03* |
| Heart/body mass | (mg/g) | 2.88 ± 0.22 | 3.27 ± 0.27* | 3.25 ± 0.17* |
Cellular area and collagen from the left ventricle: CO, FOR and NFOR (n = 3). A total of 30 cells (cellular area) and 30 fields (collagen) per animal were quantified, for a total of 90 cells and 90 fields per group. Heart mass and body mass: CO (n = 9), FOR (n = 11), NFOR (n = 8). *Significantly different from CO (P < 0.05). Mean ± SD.
Figure 4Left ventricle histology of representative animals from each of the three experimental groups. (a) Hematoxylin and eosin (40x). (b) Sirius red (40x). There was no observable difference in the cell structure
Figure 5The apoptotic index of left ventricle from the CO (n = 5), FOR (n = 5), and NFOR (n = 5) groups (means ± SD). The ratio of the number of fields that showed apoptotic nuclei to the total number of fields quantified is displayed above the SD marker for each group. *Significant difference relative to CO (P < 0.05).