| Literature DB >> 22848504 |
Bo Yang1, Rui-li Yu, Shuai Tuo, Chao-wei Tuo, Qiu-zhen Liu, Ning Zhang, Xue-chun Lu, Xiao-hua Chi, Shu-bao Lv, Li-li Cai.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Human xenograft models, resulting from orthotopic transplantation (implantation into the anatomically correct site) of histologically intact tissue into animals, are important for investigating local tumor growth, vascular and lymphatic invasion at the primary tumor site and metastasis. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22848504 PMCID: PMC3404084 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041467
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1The change of latency and survival time during establishment of HLBL-0102.
(A) Change in latency during establishment of HLBL-0102 model. Latency period (time from implantation until the tumor measured 0.5 cm in size) was observed until passage 42. (B) Change in survival time during establishment of HLBL-0102.
Figure 2Pathological examination of HLBL-0102 model.
(A) Representative image of an orthotopically transplanted mouse in the 37thgeneration. (B) Histological examination of tissue section from PHL in HLBL-0102 mice (H&E staining; 150x). (C) Immunohistochemical staining of HLBL-0102 PHL for CD20 (LSAB method; 400x). HLBL-0102 cells were strongly positive for B cell lymphoma marker, CD20. (D) Immunohistochemical staining of HLBL-0102 PHL for CD79a (LSAB method; 400x). HLBL-0102 cells were strongly positive for B cell lymphoma marker, CD79a. (E) Immunohistochemistry staining of HLBL-0102 PHL for Bcl-6 (LSAB method; 150X). (F) Immunohistochemistry staining of HLBL-0102 PHL for CD10 (LSAB method; 150X). (G) Immunohistochemistry staining of HLBL-0102 PHL for IRF4 (LSAB method; 150X). Scale bar = 50 µM for B, E, F, G. Scale bar = 20 µM for C and D.
FCM analysis.
| Groups | Normal liver (n = 30) | HLBL-0102 tumor (n = 260) | Original patient tumor (n = 30) |
| DNA index | 1.0±0.1 | 1.7±0.2 | 1.7±0.2 |
| Proliferation index | 14.7±1.4 | 34.7±2.2 | 34.2±1.6 |
| Ploidy | euploid | aneuploid | aneuploid |
P<0.05 significantly different from normal liver, Bonferroni’s correction.
Figure 3Effect of Cantide treatments on growth of HLBL-0102 PHL.
(A) Representative images of PHL treated with different concentrations of Cantide for 20 days. 5-FU treatment was used as positive control and PBS treatment was used as a negative control. (B) Dose dependent decrease in tumor weight of PHL in cantide-treated HLBL-0102 mice. *P<0.05 compared to saline group, †P<0.05 compared to Cantide 12.5, ‡P<0.05 compared to Cantide 25, §P<0.05 compared to Cantide 50, ¶P<0.05 compared to Cantide 75. Mean ± standard deviation (n = 8 each group), Experiment repeated three times; all data adjusted using Bonferroni’smethod. (C) Tumor inhibition rate of PHL in Cantide-treated HLBL-0102 mice. *P<0.05 compared to Cantide 12.5, †P<0.05 compared to Cantide 25, ‡P<0.05 compared to Cantide 50, §P<0.05 compared to Cantide 75. Mean ± standard deviation, (n = 8 each group). Experiment repeated three times. All data adjusted using Bonferroni’s method. (D) Determination of serum LDH activity in Cantide-treated HLBL-0102 mice. There was a dose-dependent decrease in LDH activity in Cantide-treated mice. *P<0.05 compared to saline group, †P<0.05 compared to Cantide 12.5, ‡P<0.05 compared to Cantide 25, §P<0.05 compared to Cantide 50, ¶P<0.05 compared to Cantide 75. Mean ± standard deviation (n = 8 each group). Experiment repeated three times. All data adjusted with Bonferroni’s method. (E) Analysis of survival curves in Cantide-treated HLBL-0102 mice. Kaplan-Meier survival curves of HLBL-0102 mice treated with different concentrations of Cantide. Mice were injected with different doses of Cantide three days after establishing tumor xenografts as described in the Methods section. Treatment was continued for 20 days and mice were observed until moribund.