Literature DB >> 22847578

Prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer and the risk of overt metastatic disease at presentation: analysis of trends over time.

Emil Scosyrev1, Guan Wu, Supriya Mohile, Edward M Messing.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to estimate the total number of patients who would be expected to present with metastatic (M1) prostate cancer (PC) in the modern US population in a given year if the age-specific and race-specific annual incidence rates of M1 PC were the same as the rates in the era before prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing.
METHODS: The authors computed the total number of men who presented with M1 PC in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 9 registries area in the year 2008 (the most recent SEER year) and estimated the number of cases that would be expected to occur in this area in the year 2008 in the absence of PSA testing. The expected number was computed by multiplying each age-race-specific average annual incidence rate from the pre-PSA era (1983-1985) by the number of men in the corresponding age-race category in the year 2008 and adding the products.
RESULTS: In the year 2008, the observed and expected numbers of men presenting with M1 PC in the SEER 9 registries area were 739 and 2277, respectively, with an expected-to-observed ratio of 3.1 (95% confidence interval, 3.0-3.2). If this ratio was applied to the total US population in the year 2008, then the total number of men presenting with M1 PC in that year would be equal to approximately 25,000 instead of the approximately 8000 actually observed.
CONCLUSIONS: If the pre-PSA era rates were present in the modern US population, then the total number of men presenting with M1 PC would be approximately 3 times greater than the number actually observed.
Copyright © 2012 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22847578     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.27503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  12 in total

Review 1.  Prostate Cancer Screening.

Authors:  William J Catalona
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.456

2.  The cost implications of prostate cancer screening in the Medicare population.

Authors:  Xiaomei Ma; Rong Wang; Jessica B Long; Joseph S Ross; Pamela R Soulos; James B Yu; Danil V Makarov; Heather T Gold; Cary P Gross
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Is prostate cancer stage migration continuing for black men in the PSA era?

Authors:  R W Dobbs; D T Greenwald; H Wadhwa; V L Freeman; M R Abern
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 5.554

4.  Prostate cancer: Proponents of PSA screening boosted by new study.

Authors:  Mina Razzak
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Implications of the new AUA guidelines on prostate cancer detection in the U.S.

Authors:  Matthew R Cooperberg
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 6.  Bone marrow fat: linking adipocyte-induced inflammation with skeletal metastases.

Authors:  Aimalie L Hardaway; Mackenzie K Herroon; Erandi Rajagurubandara; Izabela Podgorski
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 9.264

7.  Comparison of prostate cancer diagnosis in patients receiving unrelated urological and non-urological cancer care.

Authors:  Anthony T Corcoran; Marc C Smaldone; Brian L Egleston; Jay Simhan; Serge Ginzburg; Todd M Morgan; John Walton; David Y T Chen; Rosalia Viterbo; Richard E Greenberg; Robert G Uzzo; Alexander Kutikov
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  PSA screening for prostate cancer: why so much controversy?

Authors:  Fernand Labrie
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 3.285

9.  Recent decline in prostate cancer incidence in the United States, by age, stage, and Gleason score.

Authors:  Kimberly A Herget; Darshan P Patel; Heidi A Hanson; Carol Sweeney; William T Lowrance
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 4.452

10.  US Preventive Services Task Force prostate-specific antigen screening guidelines result in higher Gleason score diagnoses.

Authors:  Glen Gejerman; Patrick Ciccone; Martin Goldstein; Vincent Lanteri; Burton Schlecker; John Sanzone; Michael Esposito; Sergey Rome; Michael Ciccone; Eric Margolis; Robert Simon; Yijun Guo; Sri-Ram Pentakota; Hossein Sadeghi-Nejad
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2017-11-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.