Literature DB >> 22846707

Cardiac rehabilitation to improve physical functioning in refractory angina: a pilot study.

Elizabeth A Asbury1, Carolyn M Webb, Heather Probert, Christine Wright, Mahmoud Barbir, Kim Fox, Peter Collins.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Refractory angina patients suffer debilitating chest pain despite optimal medical therapy and previous cardiovascular intervention. Cardiac rehabilitation is often not prescribed due to a lack of evidence regarding potential efficacy and patient suitability. A randomised controlled study was undertaken to explore the impact of cardiac rehabilitation on cardiovascular risk factors, physical ability, quality of life and psychological morbidity among refractory angina sufferers.
METHODS: Forty-two refractory angina patients (65.1 ± 7.3 years) were randomly assigned to an 8-week Phase III cardiac rehabilitation program or symptom diary control. Physical assessment, Progressive Shuttle Walk test, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Health Anxiety Questionnaire, the York Angina Beliefs scale, ENRICHD Social Support Instrument and SF-36 were completed before and after intervention and at 8-week follow-up.
RESULTS: Following cardiac rehabilitation, patients demonstrated improved physical ability compared with controls in Progressive Shuttle Walk level attainment (p = 0.005) and total distance covered (p = 0.015). Angina frequency and severity remained unchanged in both groups, with the control demonstrating worsening SF-36 pain scale (63.43 ± 22.28 vs. 55.46 ± 23.98, p = 0.025). Cardiac rehabilitation participants showed improved Health Anxiety Questionnaire reassurance (1.71 ± 1.72 vs. 1.14 ± 1.23, p = 0.026) and York Beliefs anginal threat perception (12.42 ± 4.58 vs. 14.35 ± 4.73, p = 0.05) after cardiac rehabilitation. Physical measures were broadly unaffected.
CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac rehabilitation can be prescribed to improve physical ability without affecting angina frequency or severity among patients with refractory angina.
Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22846707     DOI: 10.1159/000339224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiology        ISSN: 0008-6312            Impact factor:   1.869


  12 in total

1.  A Systematic Review of Interventions for Health Anxiety Presentations Across Diverse Chronic Illnesses.

Authors:  Danielle Petricone-Westwood; Georden Jones; Brittany Mutsaers; Caroline Séguin Leclair; Christina Tomei; Geneviève Trudel; Andreas Dinkel; Sophie Lebel
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2019-02

2.  Treatment of Anxiety in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Julia M Farquhar; Gregory L Stonerock; James A Blumenthal
Journal:  Psychosomatics       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 2.386

Review 3.  Benefit-risk assessment and reporting in clinical trials of chronic pain treatments: IMMPACT recommendations.

Authors:  Bethea A Kleykamp; Robert H Dworkin; Dennis C Turk; Zubin Bhagwagar; Penney Cowan; Christopher Eccleston; Susan S Ellenberg; Scott R Evans; John T Farrar; Roy L Freeman; Louis P Garrison; Jennifer S Gewandter; Veeraindar Goli; Smriti Iyengar; Alejandro R Jadad; Mark P Jensen; Roderick Junor; Nathaniel P Katz; J Patrick Kesslak; Ernest A Kopecky; Dmitri Lissin; John D Markman; Michael P McDermott; Philip J Mease; Alec B O'Connor; Kushang V Patel; Srinivasa N Raja; Michael C Rowbotham; Cristina Sampaio; Jasvinder A Singh; Ilona Steigerwald; Vibeke Strand; Leslie A Tive; Jeffrey Tobias; Ajay D Wasan; Hilary D Wilson
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 7.926

Review 4.  Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Grace Dibben; James Faulkner; Neil Oldridge; Karen Rees; David R Thompson; Ann-Dorthe Zwisler; Rod S Taylor
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-11-06

5.  Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for postcoronary artery bypass grafting and its effect on hemodynamic responses and functional capacity evaluated using the Incremental Shuttle Walking Test: A retrospective pilot analysis.

Authors:  Ahmad Osailan; Walid Kamal Abdelbasset
Journal:  J Saudi Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-04-17

Review 6.  Treatment of refractory angina in patients not suitable for revascularization.

Authors:  Timothy D Henry; Daniel Satran; E Marc Jolicoeur
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 7.  Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Lindsey Anderson; David R Thompson; Neil Oldridge; Ann-Dorthe Zwisler; Karen Rees; Nicole Martin; Rod S Taylor
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-01-05

8.  A hybrid cardiac rehabilitation is as effective as a hospital-based program in reducing chest pain intensity and discomfort.

Authors:  Mozhgan Saeidi; Ali Soroush; Saeid Komasi; Puneetpal Singh
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2017-09-29

9.  Efficacy of risk stratification protocols and clinical, physical, and biochemical parameters to previse signals and symptoms during cardiovascular rehabilitation programs: Protocol for an observational trial.

Authors:  Laís Manata Vanzella; Carolina Takahashi; Felipe Ribeiro; Isabelle Maina Lima; Anne Kastelianne França da Silva; Diego Giulliano Destro Christófaro; Luiz Carlos Marques Vanderlei
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  Does contemporary exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation improve quality of life for people with coronary artery disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gordon McGregor; Richard Powell; Peter Kimani; Martin Underwood
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-06-07       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.