Literature DB >> 22846460

Honeybees and cell lines as models of DNA methylation and aging in response to diet.

Dianne Ford1.   

Abstract

DNA methylation patterns change as individuals grow older, and DNA methylation appears susceptible to modification by the diet. Thus DNA methylation may be a mechanism through which diet can affect aging and longevity. We propose that effects on DNA methylation also contribute to the extension in lifespan observed in response to dietary restriction. Relationships between diet-induced changes in DNA methylation and parallel effects on aging and/or lifespan could, of course, be purely associative. Proof of these ideas requires experimental model systems in which it is possible to manipulate genome methylation status and to measure effects on aging and/or lifespan. Commonly-used short-lived and genetically-malleable metazoan species, such as Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila, are not suitable for such studies; the C. elegans genome is not methylated, and DNA methylation in Drosophila is dissimilar from mammalian DNA methylation, occurring at cytosines at sites other than in CpG sequences. The honeybee provides a potentially unique and tractable model for such studies. Female larval development into the long-lived queen phenotype or short-lived worker is determined purely by diet (royal jelly) through an effect on DNA methylation, and honeybee DNA methylation mirrors that of the mammalian genome. Mammalian cell lines and biochemical approaches offer complementary tools to address specific components of hypotheses relating to effects of diet on aging through DNA methylation in a more targeted manner. Our studies using mammalian cell lines are revealing effects of Sirt1 on DNA methylation, and indicate that Sirt1 and resveratrol affect the expression of different sets of genes.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22846460     DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2012.07.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Gerontol        ISSN: 0531-5565            Impact factor:   4.032


  7 in total

Review 1.  Nutritional models of foetal programming and nutrigenomic and epigenomic dysregulations of fatty acid metabolism in the liver and heart.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Guéant; Rania Elakoum; Olivier Ziegler; David Coelho; Eva Feigerlova; Jean-Luc Daval; Rosa-Maria Guéant-Rodriguez
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 3.657

2.  DNA methylation is not involved in dietary restriction induced lifespan extension in adult Drosophila.

Authors:  Ting Lian; Uma Gaur; Q I Wu; Jianbo Tu; Boyuan Sun; Deying Yang; Xiaolan Fan; Xueping Mao; Mingyao Yang
Journal:  Genet Res (Camb)       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 1.588

Review 3.  New nucleophilic mechanisms of ros-dependent epigenetic modifications: comparison of aging and cancer.

Authors:  Igor Afanas'ev
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 6.745

4.  Reproduction, social behavior, and aging trajectories in honeybee workers.

Authors:  Luke Dixon; Ryan Kuster; Olav Rueppell
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2013-06-14

5.  Dnmt1 is essential for egg production and embryo viability in the large milkweed bug, Oncopeltus fasciatus.

Authors:  Adam J Bewick; Zachary Sanchez; Elizabeth C Mckinney; Allen J Moore; Patricia J Moore; Robert J Schmitz
Journal:  Epigenetics Chromatin       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 4.954

Review 6.  Nutrition in Cancer Therapy in the Elderly-An Epigenetic Connection?

Authors:  Janusz Blasiak; Jan Chojnacki; Elzbieta Pawlowska; Joanna Szczepanska; Cezary Chojnacki
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 5.717

7.  Genomic and epigenomic insights into nutrition and brain disorders.

Authors:  Margaret Joy Dauncey
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 5.717

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.