BACKGROUND: Bipolar voltage mapping has a role in defining endocardial-based scar in postinfarct patients undergoing ventricular tachycardia catheter ablation. The utility of bipolar and unipolar voltages in characterizing scar has not been evaluated in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy. OBJECTIVE: To relate left ventricular (LV) endocardial bipolar and unipolar voltages in these patients to scar transmurality (endocardial vs nonendocardial) and composition (homogeneous core vs heterogeneous gray). METHODS: Ten consecutive cardiomyopathy patients undergoing endocardial LV tachycardia ablation were included (age 48 ± 14 years; left ventricular ejection fraction 43% ± 15%). Preablation late gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging was used to quantify core and gray scar by using signal-intensity thresholding. Electroanatomic LV endocardial mapping provided bipolar and unipolar voltages. Electroanatomic maps and late gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging were rigidly registered in order to relate voltage to scar (registration error 3.6 ± 2.9 mm). RESULTS: Bipolar voltage was lower in endocardial core than in no scar (P <.001). Unipolar voltage was lower in endocardial core and nonendocardial core than in no scar (P <.001). Endocardial and nonendocardial gray scar had an effect similar to that of core in reducing bipolar and unipolar voltages (P <.001). The mass of healthy myocardium and endocardial core scar independently predicted bipolar and unipolar voltages using general estimating equation modeling. With receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, bipolar voltage >1.9 mV and unipolar voltage <6.7 mV had a high negative predictive value (91%) for detecting nonendocardial scar from either endocardial scar or no scar. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy, LV endocardial bipolar voltage is dependent on endocardial core and gray scar, while the unipolar voltage is influenced by core and gray scar across the LV wall as defined by late gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
BACKGROUND:Bipolar voltage mapping has a role in defining endocardial-based scar in postinfarct patients undergoing ventricular tachycardia catheter ablation. The utility of bipolar and unipolar voltages in characterizing scar has not been evaluated in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy. OBJECTIVE: To relate left ventricular (LV) endocardial bipolar and unipolar voltages in these patients to scar transmurality (endocardial vs nonendocardial) and composition (homogeneous core vs heterogeneous gray). METHODS: Ten consecutive cardiomyopathypatients undergoing endocardial LV tachycardia ablation were included (age 48 ± 14 years; left ventricular ejection fraction 43% ± 15%). Preablation late gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging was used to quantify core and gray scar by using signal-intensity thresholding. Electroanatomic LV endocardial mapping provided bipolar and unipolar voltages. Electroanatomic maps and late gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging were rigidly registered in order to relate voltage to scar (registration error 3.6 ± 2.9 mm). RESULTS:Bipolar voltage was lower in endocardial core than in no scar (P <.001). Unipolar voltage was lower in endocardial core and nonendocardial core than in no scar (P <.001). Endocardial and nonendocardial gray scar had an effect similar to that of core in reducing bipolar and unipolar voltages (P <.001). The mass of healthy myocardium and endocardial core scar independently predicted bipolar and unipolar voltages using general estimating equation modeling. With receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, bipolar voltage >1.9 mV and unipolar voltage <6.7 mV had a high negative predictive value (91%) for detecting nonendocardial scar from either endocardial scar or no scar. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy, LV endocardial bipolar voltage is dependent on endocardial core and gray scar, while the unipolar voltage is influenced by core and gray scar across the LV wall as defined by late gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Authors: Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Saenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Joshua J E Blauer; Darrell Swenson; Koji Higuchi; Gernot Plank; Ravi Ranjan; Nassir Marrouche; Rob S Macleod Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2014-05-30
Authors: Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Sáenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld Journal: Europace Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Brian P Betensky; Wei Dong; Benjamin A D'Souza; Erica S Zado; Yuchi Han; Francis E Marchlinski Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2017-02-24 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Noemi Pavo; Andras Jakab; Maximilian Y Emmert; Georg Strebinger; Petra Wolint; Matthias Zimmermann; Hendrik Jan Ankersmit; Simon P Hoerstrup; Gerald Maurer; Mariann Gyöngyösi Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-11-19 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Mathijs S van Schie; Rohit K Kharbanda; Charlotte A Houck; Eva A H Lanters; Yannick J H J Taverne; Ad J J C Bogers; Natasja M S de Groot Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2021-06-18