Literature DB >> 22846256

Disinfection byproduct formation in reverse-osmosis concentrated and lyophilized natural organic matter from a drinking water source.

Jonathan G Pressman1, Daniel L McCurry, Shahid Parvez, Glenn E Rice, Linda K Teuschler, Richard J Miltner, Thomas F Speth.   

Abstract

Drinking water treatment and disinfection byproduct (DBP) research can be complicated by natural organic matter (NOM) temporal variability. NOM preservation by lyophilization (freeze-drying) has been long practiced to address this issue; however, its applicability for drinking water research has been limited because the selected NOM sources are atypical of most drinking water sources. The purpose of this research was to demonstrate that reconstituted NOM from a lyophilized reverse-osmosis (RO) concentrate of a typical drinking water source closely represents DBP formation in the original NOM. A preliminary experiment assessed DBP formation kinetics and yields in concentrated NOM, which demonstrated that chlorine decays faster in concentrate, in some cases leading to altered DBP speciation. Potential changes in NOM reactivity caused by lyophilization were evaluated by chlorination of lyophilized and reconstituted NOM, its parent RO concentrate, and the source water. Bromide lost during RO concentration was replaced by adding potassium bromide prior to chlorination. Although total measured DBP formation tended to decrease slightly and unidentified halogenated organic formation tended to increase slightly as a result of RO concentration, the changes associated with lyophilization were minor. In lyophilized NOM reconstituted back to source water TOC levels and then chlorinated, the concentrations of 19 of 21 measured DBPs, constituting 96% of the total identified DBP mass, were statistically indistinguishable from those in the chlorinated source water. Furthermore, the concentrations of 16 of 21 DBPs in lyophilized NOM reconstituted back to the RO concentrate TOC levels, constituting 86% DBP mass, were statistically indistinguishable from those in the RO concentrate. This study suggests that lyophilization can be used to preserve concentrated NOM without substantially altering the precursors to DBP formation. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22846256     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.07.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  5 in total

1.  Characterizing Ohio River NOM Variability and Reconstituted-Lyophilized NOM as a Source Surrogate.

Authors:  Paul D Rossman; Dominic L Boccelli; Jonathan G Pressman
Journal:  J Am Water Works Assoc       Date:  2017

2.  Analysis of per- and polyfluorinated alkyl substances in sub-sampled water matrices with online solid phase extraction/isotope dilution tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Toby Sanan; Matthew Magnuson
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2020-06-07       Impact factor: 4.759

3.  Effects of source and seasonal variations of natural organic matters on the fate and transport of CeO2 nanoparticles in the environment.

Authors:  Zhen Li; Endalkachew Sahle-Demessie; Ashraf Aly Hassan; Jonathan G Pressman; George A Sorial; Changseok Han
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Validating the use of lyophilized natural organic matter as background material in GAC rapid small-scale column tests.

Authors:  Gulizhaer Abulikemu; Thomas F Speth; Jeffrey A Vogt; Maria Meyer; Ying Hong; Jonathan G Pressman
Journal:  J Water Process Eng       Date:  2022-06

5.  Mutagenicity of drinking water sampled from the Yangtze River and Hanshui River (Wuhan section) and correlations with water quality parameters.

Authors:  Xuemin Lv; Yi Lu; Xiaoming Yang; Xiaorong Dong; Kunpeng Ma; Sanhua Xiao; Yazhou Wang; Fei Tang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.