Literature DB >> 22846186

Observation of public health risk behaviours, risk communication and hand hygiene at Kansas and Missouri petting zoos--2010-2011.

G Erdozain1, K KuKanich, B Chapman, D Powell.   

Abstract

Outbreaks of human illness have been linked to visiting settings with animal contact throughout developed countries. This study details an observational study of hand hygiene tool availability and recommendations; frequency of risky behaviour; and handwashing attempts by visitors in Kansas (9) and Missouri (4), USA, petting zoos. Handwashing signs and hand hygiene stations were available at the exit of animal-contact areas in 10/13 and 8/13 petting zoos, respectively. Risky behaviours were observed being performed at all petting zoos by at least one visitor. Frequently observed behaviours were as follows: children (10/13 petting zoos) and adults (9/13 petting zoos) touching hands to face within animal-contact areas; animals licking children's and adults' hands (7/13 and 4/13 petting zoos, respectively); and children and adults drinking within animal-contact areas (5/13 petting zoos each). Of 574 visitors observed for hand hygiene when exiting animal-contact areas, 37% (n = 214) of individuals attempted some type of hand hygiene, with male adults, female adults and children attempting at similar rates (32%, 40% and 37%, respectively). Visitors were 4.8× more likely to wash their hands when a staff member was present within or at the exit to the animal-contact area (136/231, 59%) than when no staff member was present (78/343, 23%; P < 0.001, OR = 4.863, 95% CI = 3.380-6.998). Visitors at zoos with a fence as a partial barrier to human-animal contact were 2.3× more likely to wash their hands (188/460, 40.9%) than visitors allowed to enter the animals' yard for contact (26/114, 22.8%; P < 0.001, OR = 2.339, 95% CI = 1.454-3.763). Inconsistencies existed in tool availability, signage and supervision of animal contact. Risk communication was poor, with few petting zoos outlining risks associated with animal contact, or providing recommendations for precautions to be taken to reduce these risks.
© 2012 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22846186     DOI: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2012.01531.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zoonoses Public Health        ISSN: 1863-1959            Impact factor:   2.702


  4 in total

1.  How Frequently Do We Touch Facial T-Zone: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Juma Rahman; Jubayer Mumin; Bapon Fakhruddin
Journal:  Ann Glob Health       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 2.462

2.  Petting Zoo Animals as an Emerging Reservoir of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase and AmpC-Producing Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Anat Shnaiderman-Torban; Amir Steinman; Gal Meidan; Yossi Paitan; Wiessam Abu Ahmad; Shiri Navon-Venezia
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Occurrence, antimicrobial susceptibility patterns and genotypic relatedness of Salmonella spp. isolates from captive wildlife, their caretakers, feed and water in India.

Authors:  Arockiasamy Arun Prince Milton; Rajesh Kumar Agarwal; Govindarajan Bhuvana Priya; Cheruplackal Karunakaran Athira; Mani Saminathan; Avinash Reddy; Manivasagam Aravind; Ashok Kumar
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 4.434

4.  Zoonotic Fecal Pathogens and Antimicrobial Resistance in Canadian Petting Zoos.

Authors:  Cheyenne C Conrad; Kim Stanford; Claudia Narvaez-Bravo; Norman F Neumann; Krysty Munns; Lisa Tymensen; Cassandra Jokinen; Tim A McAllister
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2018-07-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.