Literature DB >> 22846059

Physical activity reduces bone loss in the distal forearm in post-menopausal women--a 25-year prospective study.

O Svejme1, H G Ahlborg, M K Karlsson.   

Abstract

Intervention studies have shown that high-intensity training programs with duration of 1-3 years can influence bone mass in post-menopausal women. We wanted to investigate whether moderate physical activity could be associated with reduced post-menopausal bone loss also in the long-term perspective. We evaluated changes in bone mass and bone structure by repeated single-photon absorptiometry measurements of the distal forearm in 91 moderately physically active and 21 inactive women, categorized according to information from questionnaires, from menopause and on average 25 years onwards. Data were calculated with analysis of variance and analysis of covariance tests and presented as means with 95% confidence interval. There were no group differences in bone mass or bone structure at menopause. The mean annual loss in bone mineral content was 1.2% (1.1, 1.3) in the physically active and 1.6% (1.3, 1.8) in the inactive women (after adjustment for menopausal age P = 0.02) and the mean decline in a strength index based on bone mass and bone structure was 0.7% (0.6, 0.8) in the physically active and 1.2% (0.8, 1.5) in the inactive women (P = 0.004). There were no group differences in the changes in bone structure. Physical activity is also in a long-term perspective associated with reduced post-menopausal bone loss.
© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone loss; bone mass; physical activity

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22846059     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2012.01504.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports        ISSN: 0905-7188            Impact factor:   4.221


  5 in total

1.  Evidence on physical activity and osteoporosis prevention for people aged 65+ years: a systematic review to inform the WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour.

Authors:  Marina B Pinheiro; Juliana Oliveira; Adrian Bauman; Nicola Fairhall; Wing Kwok; Catherine Sherrington
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 6.457

Review 2.  A review of lifestyle, smoking and other modifiable risk factors for osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Bo Abrahamsen; Dorthe Brask-Lindemann; Katrine Hass Rubin; Peter Schwarz
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2014-09-03

Review 3.  Estrogen receptors in breast and bone: from virtue of remodeling to vileness of metastasis.

Authors:  I Bado; Z Gugala; S A W Fuqua; X H-F Zhang
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 9.867

4.  The fracture predictive ability of a musculoskeletal composite score in old men - data from the MrOs Sweden study.

Authors:  Felix Cronholm; Björn E Rosengren; Jan-Åke Nilsson; Claes Ohlsson; Dan Mellström; Eva Ribom; Magnus K Karlsson
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 3.921

5.  The interaction effects of aerobic exercise training and vitamin D supplementation on plasma lipid profiles and insulin resistance in ovariectomized rats.

Authors:  Parvin Babaei; Arsalan Damirchi; Rastegar Hoseini
Journal:  J Exerc Nutrition Biochem       Date:  2015-07-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.