Literature DB >> 22845731

Workplace health promotion and stakeholder positions: a Finnish case study.

Ari-Matti Auvinen1, Kari Kohtamäki, Antti Ilvesmäki Msc.   

Abstract

Modern workplace health promotion (WHP) requires collaboration, partnerships, and alliances with both internal and external stakeholders. However, the identification of the key stakeholders as well as the systematic mapping of their views has barely been covered in the existing research literature. This article describes the stakeholders and stakeholder positions in WHP in Finland. In this study, the stakeholders were classified as internal, interface, and external stakeholders. Furthermore, based on the authors' research, stakeholders and their positions were represented on a stakeholder map as well as by the power-interest matrix of the stakeholders. The governmental authorities play a key role in driving the strategic change toward WHP by preparing the required legislation and regulatory measures. However, both active employers and active employees can through their own work accelerate the development of new WHP services. Close collaboration between employers and employees is required at the individual workplaces. Some stakeholders, such as pension funds and occupational health services (OHS) providers, can act as important driving forces and support the strategic implementation of WHP in the workplaces. However, alone they have only limited opportunities to organize the WHP activities. Understanding the various stakeholders and the systematic mapping of their positions is essential for the successful planning and implementation of WHP activities.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22845731     DOI: 10.1080/19338244.2011.598892

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Environ Occup Health        ISSN: 1933-8244            Impact factor:   1.663


  4 in total

1.  What incentives influence employers to engage in workplace health interventions?

Authors:  Camilla Martinsson; Malin Lohela-Karlsson; Lydia Kwak; Gunnar Bergström; Therese Hellman
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  Implementing a collaborative return-to-work program: Lessons from a qualitative study in a large Canadian healthcare organization.

Authors:  Kathryn Skivington; Marni Lifshen; Cameron Mustard
Journal:  Work       Date:  2016-11-22

3.  Creating value with eHealth: identification of the value proposition with key stakeholders for the resilience navigator app.

Authors:  Aniek Lentferink; Louis Polstra; Austin D'Souza; Hilbrand Oldenhuis; Hugo Velthuijsen; Lisette van Gemert-Pijnen
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 2.796

4.  Theory-Based, Participatory Development of a Cross-Company Network Promoting Physical Activity in Germany: A Mixed-Methods Approach.

Authors:  Carina Hoffmann; Gerrit Stassen; Andrea Schaller
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.