Literature DB >> 22845713

Underestimating a serving size may lead to increased food consumption when using Canada's Food Guide.

Sharona L Abramovitch1, Jacinta I Reddigan, Mazen J Hamadeh, Veronica K Jamnik, Chip P Rowan, Jennifer L Kuk.   

Abstract

It is unclear whether Canadians accurately estimate serving sizes and the number of servings in their diet as intended by Canada's Food Guide (CFG). The objective of this study was to determine if participants can accurately quantify the size of 1 serving and the number of servings consumed per day. White, Black, South Asian, and East Asian adults (n = 145) estimated the quantity of food that constituted 1 CFG serving, and used CFG to estimate the number of servings that they consumed from their 24-h dietary recall. Participants estimated 1 serving size of vegetables and fruit (+43%) and grains (+55%) to be larger than CFG serving sizes (p ≤ 0.05); meat alternatives (-33%) and cheese (-31%) to be smaller than a CFG serving size (p ≤ 0.05); and chicken, carrots, and milk servings accurately (p > 0.05). Serving size estimates were positively correlated with the amount of food participants regularly consumed at 1 meal (p < 0.001). From their food records, all ethnicities estimated that they consumed fewer servings of vegetables and fruit (-15%), grains (-28%), and meat and alternatives (-14%) than they actually consumed, and more servings of milk and alternatives (+26%, p ≤ 0.05) than they actually consumed. Consequently, 68% of participants believed they needed to increase consumption by greater than 200 kcal to meet CFG recommendations. In conclusion, estimating serving sizes to be larger than what is defined by CFG may inadvertently lead to estimating that fewer servings were consumed and overeating if Canadians follow CFG recommendations without guidance. Thus, revision to CFG or greater public education regarding the dietary guidelines is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22845713     DOI: 10.1139/h2012-071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab        ISSN: 1715-5312            Impact factor:   2.665


  5 in total

Review 1.  Self-Report Dietary Assessment Tools Used in Canadian Research: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Sharon I Kirkpatrick; Lana Vanderlee; Amanda Raffoul; Jackie Stapleton; Ilona Csizmadi; Beatrice A Boucher; Isabelle Massarelli; Isabelle Rondeau; Paula J Robson
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 8.701

2.  Typical food portion sizes consumed by Australian adults: results from the 2011-12 Australian National Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey.

Authors:  Miaobing Zheng; Jason H Y Wu; Jimmy Chun Yu Louie; Victoria M Flood; Tim Gill; Beth Thomas; Xenia Cleanthous; Bruce Neal; Anna Rangan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Comparing the perceptions and opinions of the 2007 and 2019 Canada's food guides among parents of young children.

Authors:  Alyssa V Ramuscak; David W L Ma; Laura E Forbes; Alison M Duncan; Adam Sadowski; Jess Haines
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-08-09

4.  Estimating food portions. Influence of unit number, meal type and energy density.

Authors:  Eva Almiron-Roig; Ivonne Solis-Trapala; Jessica Dodd; Susan A Jebb
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 3.868

5.  A Qualitative Investigation to Underpin the Development of an Electronic Tool to Assess Nutrition Literacy in Australians Adults.

Authors:  Alyssa M Cassar; Gareth S Denyer; Helen T O'Connor; Janelle A Gifford
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 5.717

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.