OBJECTIVE: To further the understanding of sanitation and hygiene in long-term camp populations. METHODS: Data were collected by structured observation of handwashing (126 households), a questionnaire on sanitation, hygiene and household characteristics (1089 households) and discussions with mothers. Random walk algorithms were used to select households for observation and survey. Respondents for qualitative methods were a convenience sample. RESULTS: Across all key handwash occasions [excluding events with no handwash (n=275)], soap was used for 30% of handwashes. After latrine use, both hands were washed with soap on 20% of occasions observed. Availability of soap in households differed across sites and mirrored the extent to which it was distributed free of charge. Qualitative data suggested lack of free soap as a barrier to 'safe' handwashing. Laundry was the priority for soap. In Ethiopia and Kenya, open defecation was practised by a significant minority and was more prevalent amongst households of rural origin. In Ethiopia, open defecation was significantly more prevalent amongst women. CONCLUSIONS: Despite continuing hygiene education, rates of 'safe' handwashing are sub-optimal. Soap scarcity in some households and the prioritisation of laundry are barriers to safe practice. Heterogeneity with respect to education and place of origin may need to be taken into account in the design of improved interventions.
OBJECTIVE: To further the understanding of sanitation and hygiene in long-term camp populations. METHODS: Data were collected by structured observation of handwashing (126 households), a questionnaire on sanitation, hygiene and household characteristics (1089 households) and discussions with mothers. Random walk algorithms were used to select households for observation and survey. Respondents for qualitative methods were a convenience sample. RESULTS: Across all key handwash occasions [excluding events with no handwash (n=275)], soap was used for 30% of handwashes. After latrine use, both hands were washed with soap on 20% of occasions observed. Availability of soap in households differed across sites and mirrored the extent to which it was distributed free of charge. Qualitative data suggested lack of free soap as a barrier to 'safe' handwashing. Laundry was the priority for soap. In Ethiopia and Kenya, open defecation was practised by a significant minority and was more prevalent amongst households of rural origin. In Ethiopia, open defecation was significantly more prevalent amongst women. CONCLUSIONS: Despite continuing hygiene education, rates of 'safe' handwashing are sub-optimal. Soap scarcity in some households and the prioritisation of laundry are barriers to safe practice. Heterogeneity with respect to education and place of origin may need to be taken into account in the design of improved interventions.
Authors: K B Kamm; D R Feikin; G M Bigogo; G Aol; A Audi; A L Cohen; M M Shah; J Yu; R F Breiman; P K Ram Journal: Trop Med Int Health Date: 2014-01-10 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: Sian White; Thomas Heath; Waleed Khalid Ibrahim; Dilveen Ihsan; Karl Blanchet; Val Curtis; Robert Dreibelbis Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-03-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Raymond Nyoka; Andrew M Foote; Emily Woods; Hana Lokey; Ciara E O'Reilly; Fred Magumba; Patrick Okello; Eric D Mintz; Nina Marano; Jamae F Morris Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-07-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kelly K Baker; Fahmida Dil Farzana; Farzana Ferdous; Shahnawaz Ahmed; Sumon Kumar Das; A S G Faruque; Dilruba Nasrin; Karen L Kotloff; James P Nataro; Krishnan Kolappaswamy; Myron M Levine Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2014-04-28 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Raina M Phillips; Jelena Vujcic; Andrew Boscoe; Thomas Handzel; Mark Aninyasi; Susan T Cookson; Curtis Blanton; Lauren S Blum; Pavani K Ram Journal: Confl Health Date: 2015-12-20 Impact factor: 2.723