Literature DB >> 22845191

Modeling the uptake of semivolatile organic compounds by passive air samplers: importance of mass transfer processes within the porous sampling media.

Xianming Zhang1, Frank Wania.   

Abstract

Air sampling based on diffusion of target molecules from the atmospheric gas phase to passive sampling media (PSMs) is currently modeled using the two-film approach. Originally developed to describe chemical exchange between air and water, it assumes a uniform chemical distribution in the bulk phases on either side of the interfacial films. Although such an assumption may be satisfied when modeling uptake in PSMs in which chemicals have high mobility, its validity is questionable for PSMs such as polyurethane foam disks and XAD-resin packed mesh cylinders. Mass transfer of chemicals through the PSMs may be subject to a large resistance because of the low mass fraction of gas-phase chemicals in the pores, where diffusion occurs. Here we present a model that does not assume that chemicals distribute uniformly in the PSMs. It describes the sequential diffusion of vapors through a stagnant air-side boundary layer and the PSM pores, and the reversible sorption onto the PSM. Sensitivity analyses reveal the potential influence of the latter two processes on passive sampling rates (PSRs) unless the air-side boundary layer is assumed to be extremely thick (i.e., representative of negligible wind speeds). The model also reveals that the temperature dependence of PSRs, differences in PSRs between different compounds, and a two-stage uptake, all observed in field calibrations, can be attributed to those mass transfer processes within the PSM. The kinetics of chemical sorption to the PSM from the gas phase in the macro-pores is a knowledge gap that needs to be addressed before the model can be applied to specific compounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22845191     DOI: 10.1021/es302334r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  5 in total

1.  Monitoring of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the atmosphere of southern Luxembourg using XAD-2 resin-based passive samplers.

Authors:  Claude Schummer; Brice M Appenzeller; Maurice Millet
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Simulating and explaining passive air sampling rates for semivolatile compounds on polyurethane foam passive samplers.

Authors:  Nicholas T Petrich; Scott N Spak; Gregory R Carmichael; Dingfei Hu; Andres Martinez; Keri C Hornbuckle
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Calibration and evaluation of PUF-PAS sampling rates across the Global Atmospheric Passive Sampling (GAPS) network.

Authors:  Nicholas J Herkert; Scott N Spak; Austen Smith; Jasmin K Schuster; Tom Harner; Andres Martinez; Keri C Hornbuckle
Journal:  Environ Sci Process Impacts       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 4.238

4.  Effects of room airflow on accurate determination of PUF-PAS sampling rates in the indoor environment.

Authors:  Nicholas J Herkert; Keri C Hornbuckle
Journal:  Environ Sci Process Impacts       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 4.238

5.  A Model Using Local Weather Data to Determine the Effective Sampling Volume for PCB Congeners Collected on Passive Air Samplers.

Authors:  Nicholas J Herkert; Andres Martinez; Keri C Hornbuckle
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 9.028

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.