Literature DB >> 22844654

The Health Deviation of Post-Breast Cancer Lymphedema: Symptom Assessment and Impact on Self-Care Agency.

Jane M Armer1, Mary H Henggeler, Constance W Brooks, Eris A Zagar, Sherri Homan, Bob R Stewart.   

Abstract

Breast cancer is the leading cancer among women world-wide, affecting 1 of 8 women during their lifetimes. In the US alone, some 2 million breast cancer survivors comprise 20% of all cancer survivors. Conservatively, it is estimated that some 20-40% of all breast cancer survivors will develop the health deviation of lymphedema or treatment-related limb swelling over their lifetimes. This chronic accumulation of protein-rich fluid predisposes to infection, leads to difficulties in fitting clothing and carrying out activities of daily living, and impacts self-esteem, self-concept, and quality of life. Lymphedema is associated with self-care deficits (SCD) and negatively impacts self-care agency (SCA) and physiological and psychosocial well-being. Objectives of this report are two-fold: (1) to explore four approaches of assessing and diagnosing breast cancer lymphedema, including self-report of symptoms and the impact of health deviations on SCA; and (2) to propose the development of a clinical research program for lymphedema based on the concepts of Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory (SCDNT). Anthropometric and symptom data from a National-Institutes-of-Health-funded prospective longitudinal study were examined using survival analysis to compare four definitions of lymphedema over 24 months post-breast cancer surgery among 140 of 300 participants (all who had passed the 24-month measurement). The four definitions included differences of 200 ml, 10% volume, and 2 cm circumference between pre-op baseline and/or contralateral limbs, and symptom self-report of limb heaviness and swelling. Symptoms, SCA, and SCD were assessed by interviews using a validated tool. Estimates of lymphedema occurrence varied by definition and time since surgery. The 2 cm girth change provided the highest estimation of lymphedema (82% at 24 months), followed by 200 ml volume change (57% at 24 months). The 10% limb volume change converged with symptom report of heaviness and swelling at 24 months (38-39% lymphedema occurrence), with symptom report being the earliest predictor of lymphedema occurrence than any other measurement. Findings verify the importance of subjective assessment by symptom report of limb changes and SCD following breast cancer treatment as an essential tool in early detection and treatment of lymphedema. Findings also support the importance of pre-operative baseline measurements, symptom history, and SCA for later post-op comparisons. These preliminary findings underscore the importance of strengthening SCA by educating breast cancer survivors. Self assessment, early detection, and early treatment hold the best promise for optimal management of this chronic condition, limiting detrimental effects on SCA, and improving quality of life and physiological and psychosocial well-being. These findings lay the foundation for a clinical research program in breast cancer lymphedema based on SCDNT in which education in and awareness for self-report of lymphedema-associated symptoms is a first step in screening. Increasing patient knowledge through education will increase SCA by identifying ane providing information to meet self-care requisites (SCR) related to the health deviation of lymphedema. The nurse has the opportunity to assist patients in developing self-care actions as needed to meet universal and health deviation therapeutic requisites to address self-care demands following breast cancer treatment.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 22844654      PMCID: PMC3405977     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Self Care Depend Care Nurs


  12 in total

1.  Post-breast cancer lymphedema in aging women: self-management and implications for nursing.

Authors:  Jane M Armer; Peg W Heckathorn
Journal:  J Gerontol Nurs       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.254

2.  A comparison of four diagnostic criteria for lymphedema in a post-breast cancer population.

Authors:  Jane M Armer; Bob R Stewart
Journal:  Lymphat Res Biol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.589

3.  Lymphedema in the developing and developed world: contrasts and prospects.

Authors:  M H Witte; C L Witte; P S Mortimer; S Jamal
Journal:  Lymphology       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 1.286

4.  The problem of post-breast cancer lymphedema: impact and measurement issues.

Authors:  Jane M Armer
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.176

5.  Factors associated with arm swelling after breast cancer surgery.

Authors:  B M Geller; P M Vacek; P O'Brien; R H Secker-Walker
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Predicting breast cancer-related lymphedema using self-reported symptoms.

Authors:  Jane M Armer; M Elise Radina; Davina Porock; Scott D Culbertson
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Lymphedema after treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Cihangir Ozaslan; Bekir Kuru
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Lymphoedema and reduced shoulder function as indicators of quality of life after axillary lymph node dissection for invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  A C Voogd; J M M A Ververs; A J J M Vingerhoets; R M H Roumen; J W W Coebergh; M A Crommelin
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Arm edema after lumpectomy and breast irradiation.

Authors:  Melvin Deutsch; John C Flickinger
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.339

Review 10.  Risk of lymphedema after regional nodal irradiation with breast conservation therapy.

Authors:  John J Coen; Alphonse G Taghian; Lisa A Kachnic; Sherif I Assaad; Simon N Powell
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  8 in total

1.  Is surviving enough? Coping and impact on activities of daily living among melanoma patients with lymphoedema.

Authors:  K D Cromwell; Y J Chiang; J Armer; P P Heppner; K Mungovan; M I Ross; J E Gershenwald; J E Lee; R E Royal; A Lucci; J N Cormier
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 2.520

Review 2.  Recent progress in the treatment and prevention of cancer-related lymphedema.

Authors:  Simona F Shaitelman; Kate D Cromwell; John C Rasmussen; Nicole L Stout; Jane M Armer; Bonnie B Lasinski; Janice N Cormier
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 508.702

3.  Patient Perceptions of Barriers to Self-Management of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.

Authors:  Pamela L Ostby; Jane M Armer; Kandis Smith; Bob R Stewart
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 1.967

4.  Surveillance recommendations in reducing risk of and optimally managing breast cancer-related lymphedema.

Authors:  Pamela L Ostby; Jane M Armer; Paul S Dale; Margaret J Van Loo; Cassie L Wilbanks; Bob R Stewart
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2014-08-18

5.  Complexities of Adherence and Post-Cancer Lymphedema Management.

Authors:  Pamela L Ostby; Jane M Armer
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2015-11-16

Review 6.  Long-Term Survival, Quality of Life, and Psychosocial Outcomes in Advanced Melanoma Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Authors:  Anne Rogiers; Annelies Boekhout; Julia K Schwarze; Gil Awada; Christian U Blank; Bart Neyns
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2019-04-28       Impact factor: 4.375

7.  Integrating Symptoms Into the Diagnostic Criteria for Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: Applying Results From a Prospective Surveillance Program.

Authors:  Cheryl L Brunelle; Sacha A Roberts; Nora K Horick; Tessa C Gillespie; Jamie M Jacobs; Kayla M Daniell; George E Naoum; Alphonse G Taghian
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2020-12-07

8.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Clinical Measures Considering Segmental Tissue Composition and Volume Changes of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.

Authors:  Eun Joo Yang; Seoung Yeon Kim; Woo Hyung Lee; Jae-Young Lim; Jaebong Lee
Journal:  Lymphat Res Biol       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 2.589

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.