| Literature DB >> 22844611 |
Alin Andries1, Andreas Niemeier, Rene K Støving, Basem M Abdallah, Anna-Maria Wolf, Kirsten Hørder, Moustapha Kassem.
Abstract
Objective. Recent data suggest that fetal antigen (FA1) is linked to disorders of body weight. Thus, we measured FA1 serum levels in two extreme nutritional states of morbid obesity (MO) and anorexia nervosa (AN) and monitored its response to weight changes. Design. FA1 and insulin serum concentrations were assessed in a cross-sectional study design at defined time points after gastric restrictive surgery for 25 MO patients and 15 women with AN. Results. Absolute FA1 serum levels were within the assay normal range and were not different between the groups at baseline. However, the ratio of FA1/BMI was significantly higher in AN. FA1 was inversely correlated with BMI before and after weight change in AN, but not in MO patients. In addition, MO patients displayed a significant concomitant decrease of FA1 and insulin with the first 25% of EWL, while in AN patients a significant increase of FA1 was observed in association with weight gain. Conclusion. FA1 is a sensitive indicator of metabolic adaptation during weight change. While FA1 serum levels in humans generally do not correlate with BMI, our results suggest that changes in FA1 serum levels reflect changes in adipose tissue turnover.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22844611 PMCID: PMC3403450 DOI: 10.5402/2012/592648
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ISRN Endocrinol ISSN: 2090-4630
Anthropometric and biochemical characteristics at baseline.
| Overall ( | Obese ( | AN ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years)* | 33.52 (16–56) | 40 (24–56) | 23.4 (16–41) |
| Gender | 23♀/17♂ | 8♀/17♂ | 15♂ |
| BMI (kg/m2)* | 37.24 (12–70) | 47.2 (41–70) | 15.30 (12–17) |
| Insulin ( | 10.18 (1–35) | 13 (1–35) | 3.58 (1.5–7.17)¶ |
| FA1 (ng/mL) | 23.72 (9.6–47.9) | 22.3 (9.9–45.3) | 18.9 (9.6–47.9) |
Numbers indicate median (min-max),
¶ n = 10;
*P < 0.001.
Figure 1Similar FA1 levels in MO and AN at baseline. Serum levels of FA1 were similar at baseline in both MO (n = 25) and AN (n = 15) patients. The error bars represent standard deviations and confidence limits.
Figure 2FA1 correlates with BMI in AN but not in MO. (a) We found no significant correlation between FA1 and BMI in MO, neither at baseline nor after weight change. (b) In AN, we found that FA1 slightly correlated to BMI both before (FA1 = 90.5−4.6 ∗ BMI, R-squared = 0.4; P = 0.012) and after (FA1 = 122.9−6.3 ∗ BMI, R-squared = 0.45; P = 0.006) weight change.
Figure 3(a) FA1 levels decrease with weight loss in MO and increase with weight gain in AN. FA1 levels changed significantly both during and after weight change. The error bars represent standard deviations and confidence limits. (b) The FA1/BMI ratio is lower in MO and remains constant upon weight change. In MO, FA1/BMI ratio was lower than in AN. It decreased significantly at 25% EWL, followed by a slow ascending course to the initial levels. The error bars represent standard deviations and confidence limits.