| Literature DB >> 22844430 |
Ke Ni1, Simin Li, Qiuling Xia, Na Zang, Yu Deng, Xiaohong Xie, Zhengxiu Luo, Yan Luo, Lijia Wang, Zhou Fu, Enmei Liu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Regulatory T cells (Treg cells), which are essential for regulation of immune response to respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection, are promoted by pharyngeal commensal pneumococcus. The effects of pharyngeal microflora disruption by antibiotics on airway responsiveness and relative immune responses after RSV infection have not been clarified.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22844430 PMCID: PMC3406033 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041104
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Examination of pharyngeal microflora.
(A) PCR amplification of the specific region of Streptococcus. 1, Marker; 2, Positive control, streptococcus NCTC7466; 3, Negative control; 4, No RSV infection; oral ddH2O for 7 d; 5, After RSV infection, oral ddH2O for 7 d; 6, No RSV infection, oral antibiotics for 7 d; 7, After RSV infection, oral antibiotics for 7 d; 8, Marker. PCR product, 197 bps. (B) PCR amplification of the specific region of E. coli. 1, Marker; 2, Positive control, E. coli ATCC25922; 3, Negative control; 4, No RSV infection, oral ddH2O for 7 d; 5, After RSV infection, oral ddH2O for 7 d; 6, No RSV infection, oral antibiotics for 7 d; 7, After RSV infection, oral antibiotics for 7 d; 8, Marker. PCR product, 450 bps.
Figure 2Airway inflammation, hyperresponsiveness analysis and histopathological analysis.
(A) Inflammatory cell counts and classification in BALF at 8 d pi. (B) Inflammatory cell counts and classification in BALF at 15 d pi. (C) Inflammatory cell counts and classification in BALF at 15 d pi. OVA exposure was introduced. (D) Airway hyperresponsiveness analysis at 8 d pi. (E) Airway hyperresponsiveness analysis at 15 d pi. (F) Airway hyperresponsiveness analysis at 15 d pi. OVA exposure was introduced. (H) Histopathological analysis (H&E, 100× and 200×) of the lung at 8 d pi. Infiltrating inflammatory cells are marked by arrow. (G) Histopathological analysis (H&E, 100× and 200×) of the lung at 15 d pi. Infiltrating inflammatory cells are marked by arrow. Data (N = 5−6) are presented as the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. Please note that some groups of data are presented twice in different panels for better interpretation. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001.
Figure 3Flow cytometry analysis of Treg cells response and real time-PCR analysis of Foxp3 mRNA expression.
(A) Percentages of pulmonary Treg cells at 8 d pi. (B) Percentages of splenic Treg cells at 8 d pi. (C) Percentages of pulmonary Treg cells at 15 d pi. (D) Percentages of splenic Treg cells at 15 d pi. (E) Percentages of pulmonary Treg cells at 15 d pi. OVA exposure was introduced. (F) Percentages of splenic Treg cells at 15 d pi. OVA exposure was introduced. (G) Relative Foxp3 mRNA expression in lung at 15 d pi. The mock treated group was used as the standard. (H) Relative Foxp3 mRNA expression in lung at 15 d pi, OVA exposure was introduced. The mock treated group was used as the standard. Data (N = 5−6) of FCM are presented as the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. Please note that some groups of data are presented twice in different panels for better interpretation. Data of each group in mRNA expression analysis are based on N = 7−8. * P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001.
Figure 4ELISA analysis of IL-10 and TGF-β1 in BALF.
(A) IL-10 expression in BALF. (B) TGF-β1 expression in BALF. (C) IL-10 expression in homogenate. (D) TGF-β1 expression in homogenate. Data (N = 7−9) are presented as the mean ± SEM of two independent experiments. * P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001.