| Literature DB >> 22844334 |
Ling-Hua Chang1, Chung-Hua Hsu, Gwo-Ping Jong, Shungtai Ho, Shiow-Luan Tsay, Kuan-Chia Lin.
Abstract
Background. Postoperative pain management remains a significant challenge for all healthcare providers. A randomized controlled trial was conducted to examine the adjuvant effects of auricular acupressure on relieving postoperative pain and improving the passive range of motion in patients with total knee replacement (TKR). Method. Sixty-two patients who had undergone a TKR were randomly assigned to the acupressure group and the sham control group. The intervention was delivered three times a day for 3 days. A visual analog scale (VAS) and the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire were used to assess pain intensity. Pain medication consumption was recorded, and the knee motion was measured using a goniometer. Results. The patients experienced a moderately severe level of pain postoperatively (VAS 58.66 ± 20.35) while being on the routine PCA. No differences were found in pain scores between the groups at all points. However, analgesic drug usage in the acupressure group patients was significantly lower than in the sham control group (P < 0.05), controlling for BMI, age, and pain score. On the 3rd day after surgery, the passive knee motion in the acupressure group patients was significantly better than in the sham control group patients (P < 0.05), controlling for BMI. Conclusion. The application of auricular acupressure at specific therapeutic points significantly reduces the opioid analgesia requirement and improves the knee motion in patients with TKR.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22844334 PMCID: PMC3403627 DOI: 10.1155/2012/528452
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1The study procedures and number of patients.
Figure 2The auricular acupoints chosen for acupressure.
Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study groups.
| Acupressure ( | Sham control ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agea (range 46–88) | 71.23 ± 7.09 | 70.74 ± 8.09 | .803 |
| BMIa | 27.19 ± 3.08 | 28.73 ± 4.14 | .103 |
| Genderb | |||
| Male | 3 (9.7) | 6 (19.4) | .473 |
| Female | 28 (90.3) | 25 (80.6) | |
| Religious belief b | |||
| Yes | 27 (87.1) | 23 (74.2) | .335 |
| No | 4 (12.9) | 8 (25.8) | |
| Marital statusb | |||
| Married | 18 (58.1) | 23 (74.2) | .283 |
| Widowed/separated | 13 (41.9) | 8 (25.8) | |
| Educationb | |||
| Illiterate | 11 (35.5) | 9 (29.0) | .786 |
| Primary school or higher | 20 (64.5) | 22 (71.0) | |
| Occupationb | |||
| No | 29 (93.5) | 24 (77.4) | .147 |
| Yes | 2 (6.5) | 7 (22.6) | |
| Joint replacement historya | |||
| Yes | 5 (16.1) | 4 (12.9) | 1.00 |
| No | 26 (83.9) | 27 (87.1) | |
| Surgical siteb | |||
| Left | 14 (45.2) | 17 (54.8) | .612 |
| Right | 17 (54.8) | 14 (45.2) |
aIndependent t-test; bChi-Square test.
Changes in pain scores between the groups over time.
| All | Acupressure | Sham control |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ( | ||
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | ||
| VAS | ||||
| Baseline | 58.66 ± 20.35 | 57.00 ± 17.83 | 60.32 ± 22.77 | .525 |
| Posttest 1 | 46.02 ± 18.32 | 46.87 ± 17.05 | 45.16 ± 19.77 | .717 |
| Posttest 2 | 36.77 ± 16.02 | 36.45 ± 13.74 | 37.10 ± 18.25 | .876 |
| Posttest 3 | 27.58 ± 13.96 | 27.42 ± 12.24 | 27.74 ± 15.70 | .928 |
| SF-MPQ | ||||
| Baseline | 12.85 ± 5.93 | 12.26 ± 5.79 | 13.45 ± 6.11 | .433 |
| Posttest | 5.18 ± 3.84 | 5.16 ± 4.08 | 5.19 ± 3.66 | .974 |
| Pain PPI | ||||
| Baseline | 2.95 ± 1.02 | 2.74 ± .89 | 3.16 ± 1.10 | .104 |
| Posttest | 1.34 ± .63 | 1.23 ± .50 | 1.45 ± .72 | .157 |
VAS: visual analog scale for pain; SF-MPQ: Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire; Pain PPI: present pain intensity score of SF-MPQ.
Figure 3Pain scores (VAS) between the groups over time.
Figure 4Analgesic morphine usage between the groups over time.
Generalized estimated equation model of the effects of auricular acupressure on pain medication use.
|
| Standard errors | Wald chi-squared |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 54.16 | 18.36 | 8.70 | .003 |
| Group (sham control versus acupressure) | 8.38 | 2.73 | 9.42 | .002 |
| Baseline versus Posttest 1 | −23.32 | 2.00 | 135.47 | <.001 |
| Posttest 1 versus Posttest 2 | −18.42 | 1.64 | 126.25 | <.001 |
| Posttest 2 versus Posttest 3 | −7.98 | 1.43 | 31.27 | <.001 |
| BMI | .05 | .38 | .02 | .90 |
| Age | −.19 | .18 | 1.12 | .29 |
| Pain score (VAS) | .02 | .05 | .10 | .75 |