Literature DB >> 22844055

More re-operations after uncemented than cemented hemiarthroplasty used in the treatment of displaced fractures of the femoral neck: an observational study of 11,116 hemiarthroplasties from a national register.

J-E Gjertsen1, S A Lie, T Vinje, L B Engesæter, G Hallan, K Matre, O Furnes.   

Abstract

Using data from the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register, 8639 cemented and 2477 uncemented primary hemiarthroplasties for displaced fractures of the femoral neck in patients aged > 70 years were included in a prospective observational study. A total of 218 re-operations were performed after cemented and 128 after uncemented procedures. Survival of the hemiarthroplasties was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and hazard rate ratios (HRR) for revision were calculated using Cox regression analyses. At five years the implant survival was 97% (95% confidence interval (CI) 97 to 97) for cemented and 91% (95% CI 87 to 94) for uncemented hemiarthroplasties. Uncemented hemiarthroplasties had a 2.1 times increased risk of revision compared with cemented prostheses (95% confidence interval 1.7 to 2.6, p < 0.001). The increased risk was mainly caused by revisions for peri-prosthetic fracture (HRR = 17), aseptic loosening (HRR = 17), haematoma formation (HRR = 5.3), superficial infection (HRR = 4.6) and dislocation (HRR = 1.8). More intra-operative complications, including intra-operative death, were reported for the cemented hemiarthroplasties. However, in a time-dependent analysis, the HRR for re-operation in both groups increased as follow-up increased. This study showed that the risk for revision was higher for uncemented than for cemented hemiarthroplasties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22844055     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B8.29155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  56 in total

Review 1.  What are the risk factors for post-operative infection after hip hemiarthroplasty? Systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Thibaut Noailles; Kévin Brulefert; Antoine Chalopin; Pierre Marie Longis; François Gouin
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  CORR Insights ®: Randomized trial of hemiarthroplasty versus internal fixation for femoral neck fractures: no differences at 6 years.

Authors:  Cecilia Rogmark
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: 5-year followup of a randomized trial.

Authors:  Ellen Langslet; Frede Frihagen; Vidar Opland; Jan Erik Madsen; Lars Nordsletten; Wender Figved
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Implant-related complications following hip hemiarthroplasty: a comparison of modern cemented and uncemented prostheses.

Authors:  Katharine Morris; Hywel Davies; Konrad Wronka
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-07-15

5.  Guest Editorial: An Appeal for Evidenced-based Care and Adoption of Best Practices in the Management of Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures.

Authors:  Charles N Cornell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for the management of femoral neck fractures in the elderly: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Lang Li; Xue Zhao; Xiaodong Yang; Lei Yang; Fei Xing; Xueyang Tang
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Cemented Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty Provides Definitive Treatment for Femoral Neck Fractures at 20 Years and Beyond.

Authors:  Philipp von Roth; Matthew P Abdel; W Scott Harmsen; Daniel J Berry
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-07-18       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Revision of failed hip hemiarthroplasty. Classification, management, and follow-up.

Authors:  Elsayed Morsi; Mohamed Elsawy Habib; Adel Elseedy; Taher Eid
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2016-02-22

9.  [Dislocated femoral neck fractures in geriatric patients. One-year follow-up].

Authors:  A Prokop; F Fröhlich; R Dolezych; M Chmielnicki
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.281

10.  Reasons for revision of failed hemiarthroplasty: Are there any differences between unipolar and bipolar?

Authors:  Khanin Iamthanaporn; Keerati Chareancholvanich; Chaturong Pornrattanamaneewong
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-03-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.