Literature DB >> 22844048

Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee replacement in Korean patients.

H-C Lim1, J-H Bae, S-H Song, S-J Kim.   

Abstract

Medium-term survivorship of the Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) has not yet been established in an Asian population. We prospectively evaluated the outcome of 400 phase 3 Oxford UKRs in 320 Korean patients with a mean age at the time of operation of 69 years (48 to 82). The mean follow-up was 5.2 years (1 to 10). Clinical and radiological assessment was carried out pre- and post-operatively. At five years, the mean Knee Society knee and functional scores had increased significantly from 56.2 (30 to 91) pre-operatively to 87.2 (59 to 98) (p = 0.034) and from 59.2 (30 to 93) to 88.3 (50 to 100) (p = 0.021), respectively. The Oxford knee score increased from a mean of 25.8 (12 to 39) pre-operatively to 39.8 (25 to 58) at five years (p = 0.038). The ten-year survival rate was 94% (95% confidence interval 90.1 to 98.0). A total of 14 UKRs (3.5%) required revision. The most common reason for revision was dislocation of the bearing in 12 (3%). Conversion to a total knee replacement was required in two patients who developed osteoarthritis of the lateral compartment. This is the largest published series of UKR in Korean patients. It shows that the mid-term results after a minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 UKR can yield satisfactory clinical and functional results in this group of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22844048     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B8.29372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  24 in total

Review 1.  Causes of revision following Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Seung-Ju Kim; Ricardo Postigo; Sowon Koo; Jong Hun Kim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Up to twelve year follow-up of the Oxford phase three unicompartmental knee replacement in China: seven hundred and eight knees from an independent centre.

Authors:  Huaming Xue; Yihui Tu; Tong Ma; Tao Wen; Tao Yang; Minwei Cai
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Survivorship and patient satisfaction of robotic-assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum two-year follow-up.

Authors:  Andrew D Pearle; Jelle P van der List; Lily Lee; Thomas M Coon; Todd A Borus; Martin W Roche
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Medial femoral condyle fracture as an intraoperative complication of Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement.

Authors:  Bart Ten Brinke; Laurens J de Haan; Koen L M Koenraadt; Rutger C I van Geenen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Five-year experience of cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement.

Authors:  H G Pandit; S Campi; T W Hamilton; O D Dada; S Pollalis; C Jenkins; C A F Dodd; D W Murray
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Superior femoral component alignment can be achieved with Oxford microplasty instrumentation after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yihui Tu; Huaming Xue; Tong Ma; Tao Wen; Tao Yang; Hui Zhang; Minwei Cai
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty survivorship is lower than TKA survivorship: a 27-year Finnish registry study.

Authors:  Tuukka Niinimäki; Antti Eskelinen; Keijo Mäkelä; Pasi Ohtonen; Ari-Pekka Puhto; Ville Remes
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Cemented versus Uncemented Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Is There a Difference?

Authors:  Burak Akan; Dogac Karaguven; Berk Guclu; Tugrul Yildirim; Alper Kaya; Mehmet Armangil; Ilker Cetin
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2013-12-09

9.  Patient reported and clinical outcomes of robotic-arm assisted unicondylar knee arthroplasty: Minimum two year follow-up.

Authors:  J Melvin Deese; Gwen Gratto-Cox; Denny A Carter; Thomas M Sasser; Karah L Brown
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-08-16

10.  The Survivorship and Clinical Results of Minimally Invasive Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty at 10-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Kyung Tae Kim; Song Lee; Jee Hyoung Kim; Sung Won Hong; Woo Shik Jung; Won Shik Shin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2015-05-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.