Literature DB >> 22843768

Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a 3.0-T MR study.

Boris Guiu1, Jean-Michel Petit, Violaine Capitan, Serge Aho, David Masson, Pierre-Henri Lefevre, Sylvain Favelier, Romaric Loffroy, Bruno Vergès, Patrick Hillon, Denis Krausé, Jean-Pierre Cercueil.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare pure molecular diffusion, D, perfusion-related diffusion, D*, and perfusion fraction, f, determined from diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging on the basis of the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) theory in patients with type 2 diabetes with and without liver steatosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study was approved by the appropriate ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Between December 2009 and September 2011, 108 patients with type 2 diabetes (51 men, 57 women; mean age, 50 years) underwent 3.0-T single-voxel point-resolved proton MR spectroscopy of the liver (segment VII) to calculate the liver fat fraction from water (4.76 ppm) and methylene (1.33 ppm) peaks, corrected for T1 and T2 decay. Steatosis was defined as a liver fat fraction of at least 5.56%. DW imaging was performed by using a single-shot echo-planar sequence with 11 b values (0, 5, 15, 25, 35, 50, 100, 200, 400, 600, 800 sec/mm2). Liver D, D*, and f were measured and compared in patients with and patients without steatosis (Mann-Whitney test).
RESULTS: The mean liver fat fraction was 7.8% (standard deviation, 9%; range, 0.99%-45%). Forty patients had liver steatosis. D was significantly lower in steatotic compared with nonsteatotic livers (mean, 1.03×10(-3) mm2/sec±0.23 [standard deviation] vs 1.24×10(-3) mm2/sec±0.15, respectively; P<.0001), as was D* (mean, 72.2×10(-3) mm2/sec±61.4 vs 110.6×10(-3) mm2/sec±79; P=.0025). However, f was significantly higher in steatotic compared with nonsteatotic livers (mean, 33.8%±9.4 vs 26.9%±8.8; P=.0003).
CONCLUSION: D is significantly decreased in steatosis. The reduction in D* reflects decreased liver parenchymal perfusion in steatosis. Therefore, steatosis can affect diffusion parameters obtained with IVIM. © RSNA, 2012.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22843768     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12112478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  63 in total

1.  Head and neck tumours: combined MRI assessment based on IVIM and TIC analyses for the differentiation of tumors of different histological types.

Authors:  Misa Sumi; Takashi Nakamura
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Progress in non-invasive detection of liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Chengxi Li; Rentao Li; Wei Zhang
Journal:  Cancer Biol Med       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 4.248

3.  Intravoxel Incoherent Motion-derived Histogram Metrics for Assessment of Response after Combined Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy in Rectal Cancer: Initial Experience and Comparison between Single-Section and Volumetric Analyses.

Authors:  Stephanie Nougaret; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Yulia Lakhman; Romain Sudre; Richard K G Do; Frederic Bibeau; David Azria; Eric Assenat; Nicolas Molinari; Marie-Ange Pierredon; Philippe Rouanet; Boris Guiu
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging in the liver: comparison of mono-, bi- and tri-exponential modelling at 3.0-T.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Cercueil; Jean-Michel Petit; Stéphanie Nougaret; Philippe Soyer; Audrey Fohlen; Marie-Ange Pierredon-Foulongne; Valentina Schembri; Elisabeth Delhom; Sabine Schmidt; Alban Denys; Serge Aho; Boris Guiu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Whole-body intravoxel incoherent motion imaging.

Authors:  Lukas Filli; Moritz C Wurnig; Roger Luechinger; Christian Eberhardt; Roman Guggenberger; Andreas Boss
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Spatially constrained incoherent motion method improves diffusion-weighted MRI signal decay analysis in the liver and spleen.

Authors:  Vahid Taimouri; Onur Afacan; Jeannette M Perez-Rossello; Michael J Callahan; Robert V Mulkern; Simon K Warfield; Moti Freiman
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Renal Adiposity Confounds Quantitative Assessment of Markers of Renal Diffusion With MRI: A Proposed Correction Method.

Authors:  Behzad Ebrahimi; Ahmed Saad; Kai Jiang; Christopher M Ferguson; Hui Tang; John R Woollard; James F Glockner; Stephen C Textor; Lilach O Lerman
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  Diffusion analysis with triexponential function in hepatic steatosis.

Authors:  Tatsuya Hayashi; Tosiaki Miyati; Junji Takahashi; Yoshinori Tsuji; Hidesato Suzuki; Naomi Tagaya; Mariko Hiramoto; Kei Fukuzawa; Masakatsu Tano; Satoshi Saitoh
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2013-10-04

9.  Normal hepatic parenchyma visibility and ADC quantification on diffusion-weighted MRI at 3 T: influence of age, gender, and iron content.

Authors:  Thierry Metens; Kellen Fanstone Ferraresi; Alessandra Farchione; Christophe Moreno; Maria Antonietta Bali; Celso Matos
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Evaluation of breast cancer using intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) histogram analysis: comparison with malignant status, histological subtype, and molecular prognostic factors.

Authors:  Gene Young Cho; Linda Moy; Sungheon G Kim; Steven H Baete; Melanie Moccaldi; James S Babb; Daniel K Sodickson; Eric E Sigmund
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-11-28       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.