Literature DB >> 22843549

A reanalysis of the evidence for increased efficiency in benzene metabolism at airborne exposure levels below 3 p.p.m.

Paul S Price1, Tim D Rey, Donald D Fontaine, Scott M Arnold.   

Abstract

An analysis of monitoring data on workers in Tianjin, China, reported a 9-fold increase in the production of benzene metabolites per unit exposure as air concentrations declined from 88.9 to 0.03 p.p.m. The increase is attributed to an enhanced efficiency of benzene metabolism at lower air concentrations. This finding, however, is not consistent with other studies demonstrating that adsorbed benzene is almost completely metabolized at airborne levels ranging from <1 to 70 p.p.m. In this article (i) the modeling performed in Kim et al. is repeated and the model predictions are reproduced; (ii) the impacts of technical issues in the corrections for background levels of metabolites, accounting for biases in the regression modeling, and the uncertainties introduced by the use of a calibration model to estimate benzene air levels for certain workers are evaluated and (iii) alternative methods of correcting for background levels of metabolites are examined. The new analysis indicates that findings of increased production are probably smaller and are highly uncertain, 4.8 fold [0.1-18] (mean and [95% confidence limits]). Defining background levels as either the levels in all workers with no occupational exposures or in workers with predicted air levels of <0.03 p.p.m. results in estimates of 2.4 fold [<0.1-15] and 3.3 fold [<0.1-19] increases, respectively. Based on this reanalysis, the Tianjin data appear to be too uncertain to support any conclusions of a change in the efficiency of benzene metabolism with variations in exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22843549     DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgs257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Carcinogenesis        ISSN: 0143-3334            Impact factor:   4.944


  2 in total

1.  Ignoring and adding errors do not improve the science.

Authors:  Stephen M Rappaport; Brent A Johnson; Frederic Y Bois; Lawrence L Kupper; Sungkyoon Kim; Reuben Thomas
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 2.  Low-dose metabolism of benzene in humans: science and obfuscation.

Authors:  Stephen M Rappaport; Sungkyoon Kim; Reuben Thomas; Brent A Johnson; Frederic Y Bois; Lawrence L Kupper
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 4.944

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.