Literature DB >> 22843161

The systematic study of the electroporation and electrofusion of B16-F1 and CHO cells in isotonic and hypotonic buffer.

Marko Usaj1, Masa Kanduser.   

Abstract

The fusogenic state of the cell membrane can be induced by external electric field. When two fusogenic membranes are in close contact, cell fusion takes place. An appropriate hypotonic treatment of cells before the application of electric pulses significantly improves electrofusion efficiency. How hypotonic treatment improves electrofusion is still not known in detail. Our results indicate that at given induced transmembrane potential electroporation was not affected by buffer osmolarity. In contrast to electroporation, cells' response to hypotonic treatment significantly affects their electrofusion. High fusion yield was observed when B16-F1 cells were used; this cell line in hypotonic buffer resulted in 41 ± 9 % yield, while in isotonic buffer 32 ± 11 % yield was observed. Based on our knowledge, these fusion yields determined in situ by dual-color fluorescence microscopy are among the highest in electrofusion research field. The use of hypotonic buffer was more crucial for electrofusion of CHO cells; the fusion yield increased from below 1 % in isotonic buffer to 10 ± 4 % in hypotonic buffer. Since the same degree of cell permeabilization was achieved in both buffers, these results indicate that hypotonic treatment significantly improves fusion yield. The effect could be attributed to improved physical contact of cell membranes or to enhanced fusogenic state of the cell membrane itself.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22843161     DOI: 10.1007/s00232-012-9470-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Membr Biol        ISSN: 0022-2631            Impact factor:   1.843


  42 in total

Review 1.  Nuclear reprogramming to a pluripotent state by three approaches.

Authors:  Shinya Yamanaka; Helen M Blau
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Osmotically induced membrane tension facilitates the triggering of living cell electropermeabilization.

Authors:  C Barrau; J Teissié; B Gabriel
Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.373

3.  Efficient hybridization of mouse-human cell lines by means of hypo-osmolar electrofusion.

Authors:  U Zimmermann; P Gessner; R Schnettler; S Perkins; S K Foung
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  1990-11-06       Impact factor: 2.303

4.  A biophysical approach to the optimisation of dendritic-tumour cell electrofusion.

Authors:  Vladimir L Sukhorukov; Randolph Reuss; Jörg M Endter; Steffen Fehrmann; Alisa Katsen-Globa; Petra Gessner; Andrea Steinbach; Kilian J Müller; Abraham Karpas; Ulrich Zimmermann; Heiko Zimmermann
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 3.575

5.  A time-dependent numerical model of transmembrane voltage inducement and electroporation of irregularly shaped cells.

Authors:  Gorazd Pucihar; Damijan Miklavcic; Tadej Kotnik
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 6.  Cell fusion as a hidden force in tumor progression.

Authors:  Xin Lu; Yibin Kang
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Optimization of electrofusion parameters for efficient production of murine hybridomas.

Authors:  D A Stenger; R T Kubiniec; W J Purucker; H Liang; S W Hui
Journal:  Hybridoma       Date:  1988-10

8.  Passive vaccination with a human monoclonal antibody: generation of antibodies and studies for efficacy in Bacillus anthracis infections.

Authors:  Ulrich vor dem Esche; Maria Huber; Andrea Zgaga-Griesz; Roland Grunow; Wolfgang Beyer; Ulrike Hahn; Wolfgang G Bessler
Journal:  Immunobiology       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 3.144

9.  An optimized electrofusion-based protocol for generating virus-specific human monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  Xiaocong Yu; Patricia A McGraw; Frances S House; James E Crowe
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2008-05-05       Impact factor: 2.303

10.  Direct comparison of electric field-mediated and PEG-mediated cell fusion for the generation of antibody producing hybridomas.

Authors:  U Karsten; P Stolley; I Walther; G Papsdorf; S Weber; K Conrad; L Pasternak; J Kopp
Journal:  Hybridoma       Date:  1988-12
View more
  9 in total

1.  The Effect of Nanosecond, High-Voltage Electric Pulses on the Shape and Permeability of Polymersome GUVs.

Authors:  Tina Batista Napotnik; Gianluca Bello; Eva-Kathrin Sinner; Damijan Miklavčič
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2017-07-22       Impact factor: 1.843

2.  In vitro targeted gene electrotransfer to endothelial cells with plasmid DNA containing human endothelin-1 promoter.

Authors:  Natasa Tesic; Maja Cemazar
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 1.843

3.  The Effect of Lipid Antioxidant α-Tocopherol on Cell Viability and Electrofusion Yield of B16-F1 Cells In Vitro.

Authors:  Masa Kanduser; Mojca Kokalj Imsirovic; Marko Usaj
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 1.843

4.  Dielectrophoresis study of temporal change in internal conductivity of single CHO cells after electroporation by pulsed electric fields.

Authors:  E Salimi; K Braasch; M Butler; D J Thomson; G E Bridges
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 2.800

5.  A Cell Electrofusion Chip for Somatic Cells Reprogramming.

Authors:  Wei Wu; Ya Qu; Ning Hu; Yuxiao Zeng; Jun Yang; Haiwei Xu; Zheng Qin Yin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Calcium-Free and Cytochalasin B Treatment Inhibits Blastomere Fusion in 2-Cell Stage Embryos for the Generation of Floxed Mice via Sequential Electroporation.

Authors:  Takuro Horii; Ryosuke Kobayashi; Mika Kimura; Sumiyo Morita; Izuho Hatada
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 6.600

7.  Quantification of pulsed electric field for the rupture of giant vesicles with various surface charges, cholesterols and osmotic pressures.

Authors:  Md Kabir Ahamed; Marzuk Ahmed; Mohammad Abu Sayem Karal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Cell electrofusion using nanosecond electric pulses.

Authors:  Lea Rems; Marko Ušaj; Maša Kandušer; Matej Reberšek; Damijan Miklavčič; Gorazd Pucihar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Electrofusion of single cells in picoliter droplets.

Authors:  Rogier M Schoeman; Wesley T E van den Beld; Evelien W M Kemna; Floor Wolbers; Jan C T Eijkel; Albert van den Berg
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.