Literature DB >> 22842985

Molecular characteristics and prognostic features of breast cancer in Nigerian compared with UK women.

A J Agboola1, A A Musa, N Wanangwa, T Abdel-Fatah, C C Nolan, B A Ayoade, T Y Oyebadejo, A A Banjo, A M Deji-Agboola, E A Rakha, A R Green, I O Ellis.   

Abstract

Although breast cancer (BC) incidence is lower in African-American women compared with White-American, in African countries such as Nigeria, BC is a common disease. Nigerian women have a higher risk for early-onset, with a high mortality rate from BC, prompting speculation that risk factors could be genetic and the molecular portrait of these tumours are different to those of western women. In this study, 308 BC samples from Nigerian women with complete clinical history and tumour characteristics were included and compared with a large series of BC from the UK as a control group. Immunoprofile of these tumours was characterised using a panel of 11 biomarkers of known relevance to BC. The immunoprofile and patients' outcome were compared with tumour grade-matched UK control group. Nigerian women presenting with BC were more frequently premenopausal, and their tumours were characterised by large primary tumour size, high tumour grade, advanced lymph node stage, and a higher rate of vascular invasion compared with UK women. In the grade-matched groups, Nigerian BC showed over representation of triple-negative and basal phenotypes and BRCA1 deficiency BC compared with UK women, but no difference was found regarding HER2 expression between the two series. Nigerian women showed significantly poorer outcome after development of BC compared with UK women. This study demonstrates that there are possible genetic and molecular differences between an indigenous Black population and a UK-based series. The basal-like, triple negative and BRCA1 dysfunction groups of tumours identified in this study may have implications in the development of screening programs and therapies for African patients and families that are likely to have a BRCA1 dysfunction, basal like and triple negative.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22842985     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-012-2173-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  15 in total

Review 1.  Racial Differences in Cancer Susceptibility and Survival: More Than the Color of the Skin?

Authors:  Berna C Özdemir; Gian-Paolo Dotto
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2017-03-06

Review 2.  Breast cancer in Sub-Saharan Africa: opportunities for prevention.

Authors:  Louise A Brinton; Jonine D Figueroa; Baffour Awuah; Joel Yarney; Seth Wiafe; Shannon N Wood; Daniel Ansong; Kofi Nyarko; Beatrice Wiafe-Addai; Joe Nat Clegg-Lamptey
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Does race predict survival for women with invasive breast cancer?

Authors:  Siún M Walsh; Emily C Zabor; Michelle Stempel; Monica Morrow; Mary L Gemignani
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Breast cancer survival in Soweto, Johannesburg, South Africa: A receptor-defined cohort of women diagnosed from 2009 to 11.

Authors:  Herbert Cubasch; Caroline Dickens; Maureen Joffe; Raquel Duarte; Nivashni Murugan; Ming Tsai Chih; Kiashanee Moodley; Vinay Sharma; Oluwatosin Ayeni; Judith S Jacobson; Alfred I Neugut; Valerie McCormack; Paul Ruff
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Few Losses to Follow-up in a Sub-Saharan African Cancer Cohort via Active Mobile Health Follow-up.

Authors:  Milena Foerster; Angelica Anele; Charles Adisa; Moses Galukande; Groesbeck Parham; Annelle Zietsman; Christopher Sule Oyamienlen; Kingsley Chukwunyere Iwuoha; Esther Ezeigbo; Evelyn Bakengesa; Agnes Kaggwa; Allen Naamala; Anne Nteziryayo; Teopista Nakazibwe; Leeya F Pinder; Emily Walubita; Johanna Pontac; Benjamin O Anderson; Fiona McKenzie; Joachim Schüz; Isabel Dos Santos Silva; Valerie McCormack
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Reproductive factors and the risk of breast cancer among Nigerian women by age and oestrogen receptor status.

Authors:  Samuel O Azubuike; Louise Hayes; Linda Sharp; Richard McNally
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 2.532

7.  Checkpoint Kinase 1 Expression Predicts Poor Prognosis in Nigerian Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Henry Okuchukwu Ebili; Victoria O Iyawe; Kikelomo Rachel Adeleke; Babatunde Abayomi Salami; Adekunbiola Aina Banjo; Chris Nolan; Emad Rakha; Ian Ellis; Andrew Green; Ayodeji Olayinka Johnson Agboola
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.074

8.  Cell Proliferation (KI-67) Expression Is Associated with Poorer Prognosis in Nigerian Compared to British Breast Cancer Women.

Authors:  Ayodeji O J Agboola; Adekumbiola A F Banjo; Charles C Anunobi; Babatunde Salami; Mopelola Deji Agboola; Adewale A Musa; Christopher C Nolan; Emad A Rakha; Ian O Ellis; Andrew R Green
Journal:  ISRN Oncol       Date:  2013-04-11

Review 9.  Receptor-defined subtypes of breast cancer in indigenous populations in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amanda Eng; Valerie McCormack; Isabel dos-Santos-Silva
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Molecular breast cancer subtypes and therapies in a public hospital of northeastern Brazil.

Authors:  Ana Cláudia de Macêdo Andrade; Carlos Alberis Ferreira Júnior; Beatriz Dantas Guimarães; Ana Waleska Pessoa Barros; Gibran Sarmento de Almeida; Mathias Weller
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 2.809

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.