BACKGROUND: Proteinuria and albuminuria are important markers of allograft pathology and are associated with graft loss and cardiovascular disease. Traditionally, these have been quantified using a 24-hr urine collection, but spot urine measurements (albumin-creatinine and protein-creatinine ratios) have become popular because of convenience. Aside from tests of correlation, there has been little evaluation of these measurements in kidney transplantation. METHODS: To further assess the value of albumin-creatinine and protein-creatinine ratios, we measured protein-creatinine ratio and 24-hr urine protein excretion (n=192) and albumin-creatinine ratio and 24-hr urine albumin excretion (n=189) in stable renal transplant patients. Bias (measured minus estimated value), precision, and accuracy was calculated. RESULTS: For the protein-creatinine ratio, percent bias ranged from 12% to 21%, and the accuracy (within 30% of 24-hr collection) was only 47% to 56% depending on the degree of proteinuria. For the albumin-creatinine ratio, percent bias ranged from 9% to 21%, and the accuracy (within 30%) ranged from 38% to 80% depending on the degree of albuminuria. There was no statistical difference between accuracy of protein-creatinine and albumin-creatinine ratios. CONCLUSIONS: The ability of the albumin-creatinine and protein-creatinine ratios to accurately predict 24-hr albumin and protein excretion is modest. Given the similar accuracy of both measurements, either protein-creatinine ratio or albumin-creatinine ratio can be used for monitoring protein excretion. However, given the limitations of both the albumin-creatinine ratio and protein-creatinine ratio in this population, a 24-hr urine collection should be considered before making major clinical decisions (e.g., biopsy) based on the presence of proteinuria.
BACKGROUND:Proteinuria and albuminuria are important markers of allograft pathology and are associated with graft loss and cardiovascular disease. Traditionally, these have been quantified using a 24-hr urine collection, but spot urine measurements (albumin-creatinine and protein-creatinine ratios) have become popular because of convenience. Aside from tests of correlation, there has been little evaluation of these measurements in kidney transplantation. METHODS: To further assess the value of albumin-creatinine and protein-creatinine ratios, we measured protein-creatinine ratio and 24-hr urine protein excretion (n=192) and albumin-creatinine ratio and 24-hr urine albumin excretion (n=189) in stable renal transplant patients. Bias (measured minus estimated value), precision, and accuracy was calculated. RESULTS: For the protein-creatinine ratio, percent bias ranged from 12% to 21%, and the accuracy (within 30% of 24-hr collection) was only 47% to 56% depending on the degree of proteinuria. For the albumin-creatinine ratio, percent bias ranged from 9% to 21%, and the accuracy (within 30%) ranged from 38% to 80% depending on the degree of albuminuria. There was no statistical difference between accuracy of protein-creatinine and albumin-creatinine ratios. CONCLUSIONS: The ability of the albumin-creatinine and protein-creatinine ratios to accurately predict 24-hr albumin and protein excretion is modest. Given the similar accuracy of both measurements, either protein-creatinine ratio or albumin-creatinine ratio can be used for monitoring protein excretion. However, given the limitations of both the albumin-creatinine ratio and protein-creatinine ratio in this population, a 24-hr urine collection should be considered before making major clinical decisions (e.g., biopsy) based on the presence of proteinuria.
Authors: N Mansournia; S Riyahi; S Tofangchiha; M A Mansournia; M Riahi; Z Heidari; E Hazrati Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2016-10-13 Impact factor: 4.256