Literature DB >> 22842484

Room for improvement: patient, parent, and practitioners' perceptions of foot problems and foot care in juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Gordon J Hendry1, Debbie E Turner, Paula K Lorgelly, James Woodburn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the perceived impact of disease-related foot problems and foot care in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) from the perspectives of patients, parents, pediatric rheumatologists, and health professionals.
DESIGN: A qualitative study using an interpretative phenomenological approach.
SETTING: Outpatients department, public health service children's hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=15; 4 adult patients, 2 parents of children with JIA, 3 pediatric rheumatologists, and 6 health professionals) from 2 National Health Service rheumatology centers (1 pediatric and 1 adult).
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Qualitative outcomes were participants' perceptions elicited using semistructured interviews (telephone or face-to-face) and focus groups using an interpretative phenomenological approach. A data-driven inductive approach to coding and theme development was adopted for transcript analysis.
RESULTS: Participants volunteered to take part in a total of 7 interviews and 2 focus groups. The analysis revealed 6 key themes related to the impact of foot problems and perceptions of foot care from respective groups. These were the following: (1) pain, (2) mobility impairment, (3) reduced ability to perform activities of daily living, (4) footwear difficulties, (5) poor referral pathways/delayed access to care, and (6) lack of evidence in support of conservative foot care.
CONCLUSIONS: Several areas for development of foot care services were identified including a need for improved referral pathways, shorter waiting times for initial consultations, greater attention to patient compliance, and a need for better evidence in support of customized foot orthoses. Several key foot health-related outcomes were identified, which may be of importance for measuring therapeutic response to foot-related interventions.
Copyright © 2012 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22842484     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  5 in total

1.  An exploration of parents' preferences for foot care in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a possible role for the discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Gordon J Hendry; Debbie E Turner; Janet Gardner-Medwin; Paula K Lorgelly; James Woodburn
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 2.303

2.  Focusing research efforts on the unique needs of women prosthesis users.

Authors:  Matthew J Major; Andrew H Hansen; Elizabeth Russell Esposito
Journal:  J Prosthet Orthot       Date:  2021-01-08

3.  Patient and clinician views on the quality of foot health care for rheumatoid arthritis outpatients: a mixed methods service evaluation.

Authors:  Savia de Souza; Ruth Williams; Heidi Lempp
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 4.  Evidence for current recommendations concerning the management of foot health for people with chronic long-term conditions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Katherine Edwards; Alan Borthwick; Louise McCulloch; Anthony Redmond; Rafael Pinedo-Villanueva; Daniel Prieto-Alhambra; Andrew Judge; Nigel Arden; Catherine Bowen
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 2.303

5.  Stakeholder views of podiatry services in the UK for people living with arthritis: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Charlotte Dando; Dawn Bacon; Alan Borthwick; Catherine Bowen
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 2.303

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.