Literature DB >> 22842412

Cleft lip and palate: an objective measure outcome study.

Hani Sinno1, Youssef Tahiri, Stephanie Thibaudeau, Ali Izadpanah, George Christodoulou, Samuel J Lin, Mirko Gilardino.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cleft lip and/or palate is a debilitating condition if left unrepaired, resulting in significant speech, hearing, swallowing, feeding, and psychosocial impairments. The authors' objective was to determine the potential impact of being born with cleft lip and/or palate by using previously validated health state utility assessment measures.
METHODS: A utility assessment using the visual analogue scale, time trade-off, and standard gamble was used to obtain utilities for cleft lip and/or palate, monocular blindness, and binocular blindness from a prospective sample of the general population and medical students. Average utility scores were compared using paired t test. Linear regression was performed using age, race, and education as independent predictors of each of the utility scores.
RESULTS: Over a 1-year prospective enrollment period, 110 participants were included in our utility analysis. The utility outcome scores for cleft lip and/or palate (visual analogue scale, time trade-off, and standard gamble, 0.69±0.18, 0.85±016, and 0.84±0.18, respectively) were statistically different from those of binocular blindness (visual analogue scale, time trade-off, and standard gamble: 0.38±0.17, 0.70±0.24, and 0.66±0.25, respectively; p<0.001) but not statistically different from those of monocular blindness (visual analogue scale, time trade-off, and standard gamble, 0.67±0.15, 0.86±0.15, and 0.84±0.18, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in utility scores between male and female participants.
CONCLUSION: The results of the study demonstrate objectively via health state utility scores that the perceived burden of being born with cleft lip and/or palate is comparable to living with monocular blindness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22842412     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182589d4b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  7 in total

1.  Mastopexy for breast ptosis: Utility outcomes of population preferences.

Authors:  Ahmed Ms Ibrahim; Hani H Sinno; Ali Izadpanah; Joshua Vorstenbosch; Tassos Dionisopoulos; Mark K Markarian; Bernard T Lee; Samuel J Lin
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 0.947

2.  Patient-Proxy and Societal Perspectives of Quality-of-Life Utilities in Children With Cleft Lip and Palate Managed With Surgical Repair vs No Repair in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Karen Y Chung; Gebremedhin B Gebretekle; Andrew Howard; Eleanor Pullenayegum; Mekonen Eshete; Christopher R Forrest; Beate Sander
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-07-01

3.  Evaluation of Societal Health Utility of Facial Palsy and Facial Reanimation.

Authors:  Callum Faris; Oren Tessler; Alyssa Heiser; Tessa Hadlock; Nate Jowett
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 4.611

4.  The utility of outcome studies in plastic surgery.

Authors:  Hani Sinno; Tassos Dionisopoulos; Sumner A Slavin; Ahmed M S Ibrahim; Kevin C Chung; Samuel J Lin
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2014-08-07

5.  Societal-Perceived Health Utility of Hypertrophic Facial Port-Wine Stain and Laser Treatment.

Authors:  Alyssa Heiser; Nate Jowett; Jessica Occhiogrosso; Oren Tessler; Oon T Tan
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med       Date:  2020-04-22

6.  Utility Outcome Measures for the Treatment of Ameloblastomas during Childhood.

Authors:  Constanta David; Johnny I Efanov; Daniel E Borsuk
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-01-22

7.  A Systematic Review of Health State Utility Values in the Plastic Surgery Literature.

Authors:  Adrienne N Christopher; Martin P Morris; Viren Patel; Kevin Klifto; John P Fischer
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-11-29
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.