Literature DB >> 22841967

Calcaneal quantitative ultrasound compared with hip and femoral neck dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in people with a spinal cord injury.

Thomas J Schnitzer1, Nicole Wysocki, Danielle Barkema, James Griffith, Victoria Lent, Meghan Romba, Rachel Welbel, Sheena Bhuva, Bindu Manyam, Sarah Linn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of calcaneal quantitative ultrasound (QUS) measurements for identifying osteoporosis determined by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the hip in a spinal cord injury (SCI) population.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional retrospective review of data collected in the bone health registry of persons with a disability.
SETTING: Inpatients and outpatients at a single acute rehabilitation hospital. PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of 66 participants, both inpatients and outpatients, with a spinal cord injury.
METHODS: Calcaneal T scores were determined by ultrasound, and bone density of the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck were determined by DXA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Right and left calcaneal QUS T scores and right and left hip and femoral neck DXA T scores.
RESULTS: Right and left hip DXA T scores were strongly associated with corresponding right and left calcaneal QUS T scores (right: r = .72, P < .001; left: r = .70, P < .001). Similar associations were found when we evaluated femoral neck T scores and calcaneal QUS T scores. Receiver operating characteristic analysis for evaluating QUS to identify DXA-defined osteoporosis demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.81 for all participants (acute and chronic injury) and 0.68 for those with a chronic SCI.
CONCLUSIONS: A strong association exists between calcaneal QUS T scores and bone density T scores at the hip measured by DXA. QUS may have a place in the screening of people with SCI 1 year or more after their injury to evaluate their bone status.
Copyright © 2012 American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22841967     DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.05.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PM R        ISSN: 1934-1482            Impact factor:   2.298


  5 in total

1.  Radiofrequency echographic multispectrometry compared with dual X-ray absorptiometry for osteoporosis diagnosis on lumbar spine and femoral neck.

Authors:  M Di Paola; D Gatti; O Viapiana; L Cianferotti; L Cavalli; C Caffarelli; F Conversano; E Quarta; P Pisani; G Girasole; A Giusti; M Manfredini; G Arioli; M Matucci-Cerinic; G Bianchi; R Nuti; S Gonnelli; M L Brandi; M Muratore; M Rossini
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Osteoporosis in adults with cerebral palsy: feasibility of DXA screening and risk factors for low bone density.

Authors:  C Marciniak; J Gabet; J Lee; M Ma; K Brander; N Wysocki
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  New perspectives in echographic diagnosis of osteoporosis on hip and spine.

Authors:  Sergio Casciaro; Francesco Conversano; Paola Pisani; Maurizio Muratore
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2015-10-26

4.  Canal to diaphysis ratio as a risk factor for hip fractures and hip fracture pattern.

Authors:  Prasad Ellanti; Kunal Mohan; Andrew Moriarity; Niall Hogan; Tom McCarthy
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2017-11-10

Review 5.  Bone Mineral Density Post a Spinal Cord Injury: A Review of the Current Literature Guidelines.

Authors:  Georgia Antoniou; Ioannis S Benetos; John Vlamis; Spyros G Pneumaticos
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-03-23
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.