Literature DB >> 22841169

Use of continuous flow ventricular assist devices in patients with heart failure and a normal ejection fraction: a computer-simulation study.

Francesco Moscato1, Christian Wirrmann, Marcus Granegger, Farsad Eskandary, Daniel Zimpfer, Heinrich Schima.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Continuous flow left ventricular assist devices are used in end-stage systolic heart failure. However, about one half of the patients with heart failure exhibit diastolic dysfunction with a normal ejection fraction. In the present study, the possible hemodynamic consequences of continuous flow left ventricular assist devices use for these patients were investigated.
METHODS: A previously developed cardiovascular model was modified to reproduce the peculiar hemodynamics of heart failure with a normal ejection fraction. The model was based on and validated with patient data derived from the published data. A continuous flow left ventricular assist device model was included and the hemodynamic effects of pump support evaluated at rest and during exercise.
RESULTS: The model accurately reproduced the published data both at rest and during exercise, leading to simulated hemodynamic values within the standard deviations of patient variability. At rest, pump support decreased the end-diastolic left ventricular pressure (6 vs 15 mm Hg) and volume (88 vs 135 mL). During exercise, maximal pump support substantially unloaded the left ventricle (end-diastolic pressure, 14 vs 35 mm Hg; volume, 133 vs 158 mL) and the pulmonary venous circulation (left atrial pressure, 12 vs 24 mm Hg) and resulted in a slight increase in cardiac output (11.7 vs 9.9 L/min).
CONCLUSIONS: The simulation results suggested that continuous flow left ventricular assist devices improve the hemodynamics in patients with heart failure and a normal ejection fraction. For an optimal use of continuous flow left ventricular assist devices, low speeds should be maintained at rest, to avoid suction. However, during physical activity, higher speeds are needed to prevent an abnormal increase in the ventricular filling pressures typical of patients with heart failure and a normal ejection fraction.
Copyright © 2013 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22841169     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.06.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  7 in total

Review 1.  Left atrial assist device for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: initial results with torque control mode in diastolic heart failure model.

Authors:  Chihiro Miyagi; Barry D Kuban; Christine R Flick; Anthony R Polakowski; Takuma Miyamoto; Jamshid H Karimov; Randall C Starling; Kiyotaka Fukamachi
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 4.214

2.  Left Atrial Circulatory Assistance in Simulated Diastolic Heart Failure Model: First in Vitro and in Vivo.

Authors:  Chihiro Miyagi; Kiyotaka Fukamachi; Barry D Kuban; Shengqiang Gao; Takuma Miyamoto; Christine R Flick; Anthony R Polakowski; David J Horvath; Randall C Starling; Jamshid H Karimov
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 6.592

Review 3.  Device-based treatment options for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Chihiro Miyagi; Takuma Miyamoto; Jamshid H Karimov; Randall C Starling; Kiyotaka Fukamachi
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.214

4.  Comparison of device-based therapy options for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a simulation study.

Authors:  Marcus Granegger; Christoph Gross; David Siemer; Andreas Escher; Sigrid Sandner; Martin Schweiger; Günther Laufer; Daniel Zimpfer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Framework for patient-specific simulation of hemodynamics in heart failure with counterpulsation support.

Authors:  Mattia Arduini; Jonathan Pham; Alison L Marsden; Ian Y Chen; Daniel B Ennis; Seraina A Dual
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-08-01

6.  A Valveless Pulsatile Pump for Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Hemo- and Fluid Dynamic Feasibility.

Authors:  Andreas Escher; Young Choi; Fraser Callaghan; Bente Thamsen; Ulrich Kertzscher; Martin Schweiger; Michael Hübler; Marcus Granegger
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Hemodynamic exercise responses with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: Comparison of patients' response and cardiorespiratory simulations.

Authors:  Christoph Gross; Libera Fresiello; Thomas Schlöglhofer; Kamen Dimitrov; Christiane Marko; Martin Maw; Bart Meyns; Dominik Wiedemann; Daniel Zimpfer; Heinrich Schima; Francesco Moscato
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.