Literature DB >> 22840782

Avian influenza and ban on overnight poultry storage in live poultry markets, Hong Kong.

Y H Connie Leung1, Eric H Y Lau, Li Juan Zhang, Yi Guan, Benjamin J Cowling, J S Malik Peiris.   

Abstract

We analyzed ≈ 12 years of surveillance data on avian influenza in Hong Kong live poultry markets. A ban on keeping live poultry overnight in these markets reduced virus isolation rates by 84% in chickens (p = 0.006) and 100% (p = 0.01) in minor poultry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22840782      PMCID: PMC3414033          DOI: 10.3201/eid1808.111879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


Previous influenza pandemics originated from influenza viruses of birds (). Live poultry markets play a crucial role in maintenance, amplification, and dissemination of avian influenza viruses (,) and are high-risk locations for potential zoonotic transmission of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) virus (H5N1) to humans (,). From September 1999 through May 2011, fecal dropping samples were collected monthly under the poultry cages in live poultry markets in Hong Kong as part of a systematic longitudinal avian influenza surveillance program. During the 12-year period of surveillance, several interventions were implemented by the Hong Kong government in response to outbreaks of influenza virus (H5N1) in live poultry markets and on poultry farms. In July 2001, a monthly rest day was first implemented; under this system, all poultry in live poultry markets must be sold or slaughtered at the end of the day, poultry stalls must be cleaned and disinfected, and the stalls must be left free of live poultry for 1 day before restocking any live poultry the next day. In February 2002, a ban on sales of live quail was implemented in because an influenza virus (H9N2) lineage commonly isolated from quail possessed the internal genes of the virus that caused the avian influenza (H5N1) outbreak in Hong Kong in 1997 (). In response to further incursions of avian influenza (H5N1) into poultry markets and farms in Hong Kong, a second monthly rest day in live poultry markets was introduced in March 2003, and a complete ban on holding live poultry overnight in live poultry markets was implemented in July 2008. Previously, we analyzed data from September 1999 through December 2005 and demonstrated that 1 rest day per month significantly reduced isolation rates of influenza virus in minor poultry (i.e., silkie chickens, pigeons, chukars, guinea fowls, and pheasants) but that an additional rest day each month did not significantly reduce the isolation rate further (). In this follow-up study, which includes an additional 6 years of data, we investigated the effect of a ban on keeping live poultry overnight at live poultry markets on isolation rates of influenza A virus (H9N2) from chickens and minor poultry.

The Study

When the live poultry market surveillance program began in September 1999, eight of a total of 80 live poultry markets were selected to represent the 3 major regions of Hong Kong: Hong Kong island, Kowloon, and the New Territories. Since then, the number of markets has declined, and by May 2011, only 5 of the 8 selected live poultry markets continued in operation (of a total of 39 operating live poultry markets). A total of 53,541 samples were collected during these 141 months of consecutive sampling. We previously published data on the effect of introducing various interventions in live poultry markets, which included the ban on the sales of live quail and the introduction of rest days (). In addition to collecting fecal droppings from the cage floors for virus isolation, we collected data on the total sales of chickens and minor poultry, the proportion of chickens imported as a ratio of the whole, the temperature and relative humidity, and the type of ventilation used, as described (). Laboratory processing of the specimens was conducted as described (). Samples collected in virus transport medium were inoculated into 9–11-day-old embryonated eggs, and allantoic fluid with positive hemagglutination was confirmed and subtyped using standard antiserum. Because HPAI A virus (H5N1) is rarely detected in live poultry markets in Hong Kong, we used isolation rates of influenza A virus (H9N2) as an indicator of the effect of these interventions on avian influenza virus circulation. The median numbers of samples collected weekly from chickens and minor poultry were 107 (range 3–722) and 23 (range 1–397), respectively (see Technical Appendix for weekly numbers of samples). The Poisson generalized model () with influenza virus (H9N2) weekly isolation counts as the outcome variable was fitted as described () and adjusted for proportion of chickens imported; total sales of chickens and minor poultry; ventilation system; weekly average temperature; relative humidity; seasonal variations; sample size; and periods corresponding to the respective interventions: period I (no rest day), II (1 monthly rest day with quail being sold in the live poultry market), III (1 monthly rest day with elimination of live quail from the live poultry market), IV (2 monthly rest days), and V (ban on holding poultry overnight in live poultry market). These variables were considered potentially important confounders related to transmission efficiency of avian influenza virus (), source, type, and volume of poultry. Weekly virus isolation counts were analyzed from September 22, 1999, through May 31, 2011. A separate model for poultry and minor poultry was fitted, and all analyses were implemented by using R version 2.12.1 software (R Development Core Team, Vienna, Austria). The Figure shows overall isolation rates by week for chicken and minor poultry from 1999 through 2011; the Table gives the parameter estimates for the final fitted models, which were adjusted for the effect of covariables that could affect the isolation of influenza in the study. For chickens and minor poultry, compared with the reference category of 2 monthly rest days, the ban on keeping live poultry overnight in live poultry markets was associated with dramatic and significant reduction of influenza virus (H9N2) isolation. The isolation rate of influenza virus (H9N2) among chickens declined 84% (adjusted relative risk 0.16; p = 0.006), and no influenza subtype H9N2 viruses were isolated from minor poultry after the ban on holding poultry overnight in live poultry markets was implemented. Higher volume of minor poultry sales was also significantly associated with higher isolation rate of influenza virus (H9N2).
Figure

Weekly influenza virus A (H9N2) isolation rates for chickens (A) and minor poultry (B) in live poultry markets, Hong Kong, September 1999–May 2011. Vertical lines denote periods for different interventions: I, no rest day; II, 1 monthly rest day with quail sold in live poultry markets; III, 1 monthly rest day with no sales of quail in live poultry markets; IV,: 2 monthly rest days; V, ban on keeping live poultry overnight in live poultry markets.

Table

Poisson generalized linear models for influenza virus (H9N2) isolation rates in live poultry markets, by poultry type, Hong Kong, September 1999–May 2011*

VariableChickens
Minor poultry
aRR (95% CI)p valueaRR (95% CI)p value
Period
No rest day1.69 (0.91–3.15)0.102.47 (1.23–4.98)0.01
1 rest day with quail†1.25 (0.73–2.15)0.420.99 (0.49–2.01)0.97
1 rest day without quail†1.00 (0.60–1.64)0.970.99 (0.53–1.85)0.97
2 rest daysReferenceReference
Ban on keeping live poultry overnight in live poultry markets0.16 (0.04–0.60)0.0060.01‡
Proportion of chickens imported, per 10% increase0.87 (0.73–1.02)0.091.02 (0.79–1.32)0.87
Total sales
Chickens, per 100,000 sold1.04 (0.98–1.09)0.191.05 (0.98–1.13)0.15
Minor poultry, per 100,000 sold2.52 (1.49–4.25)0.0013.15 (1.54–6.44)0.002
Chicken × minor poultry§0.98 (0.97–1.00)0.030.97 (0.95–0.99)0.007
Ventilation system
Natural ventilationReferenceReference
Market economic air treatment system1.02 (0.79–1.31)0.891.02 (0.78–1.34)0.87
Air conditioned0.71 (0.42–1.22)0.210.97 (0.56–1.68)0.90
Temperature, °C0.98 (0.99–1.02)0.961.05 (0.96–1.16)0.29
Relative humidity, %1.00 (0.99–1.02)0.630.99 (0.97–1.00)0.10
Seasonality term¶
α (cosine component)0.19 (–0.19 to 0.58)0.33–0.10 (–0.57 to 0.37)0.68
β (sine component)0.30 (–0.11 to 0.70)0.150.47 (–0.06 to 0.99)0.08

*aRR, adjusted relative risk. †Indicates before and after ban on sales of live quail. ‡Reliable confidence interval cannot be estimated because of zero isolation of influenza virus (H9N2) from minor poultry after introduction of a ban on keeping live poultry overnight in live poultry markets. p value was calculated using likelihood ratio test. §Interaction term. ¶The seasonality coefficients α and β contribute to the estimated isolation rate in week t via the terms αcos(2πt/52) + βsin(2πt/52).

Weekly influenza virus A (H9N2) isolation rates for chickens (A) and minor poultry (B) in live poultry markets, Hong Kong, September 1999–May 2011. Vertical lines denote periods for different interventions: I, no rest day; II, 1 monthly rest day with quail sold in live poultry markets; III, 1 monthly rest day with no sales of quail in live poultry markets; IV,: 2 monthly rest days; V, ban on keeping live poultry overnight in live poultry markets. *aRR, adjusted relative risk. †Indicates before and after ban on sales of live quail. ‡Reliable confidence interval cannot be estimated because of zero isolation of influenza virus (H9N2) from minor poultry after introduction of a ban on keeping live poultry overnight in live poultry markets. p value was calculated using likelihood ratio test. §Interaction term. ¶The seasonality coefficients α and β contribute to the estimated isolation rate in week t via the terms αcos(2πt/52) + βsin(2πt/52).

Conclusions

A previous study that used a stochastic metapopulation model showed that frequent rest days in live poultry markets were effective for reducing transmission of avian influenza (H5N1) (). Our findings show a large additional decline in the influenza virus (H9N2) isolation rate after implementation of a ban on keeping live poultry overnight, which suggests that this intervention has an even greater effect on reducing viral load in live poultry markets than the previous intervention of 1 or 2 rest days per month. While low pathogenic influenza virus (H9N2) was the indicator virus in our study, it is likely that these interventions would have comparable effects on highly pathogenic viruses such as avian influenza (H5N1); this effect has been demonstrated by mathematical modeling (). Studies by others on social network analysis have shown that daily cage cleaning and disinfection of live poultry markets in southern China (), and protective factors including removal of waste in Indonesia () contributed to a reduction of HPAI (H5N1) in live poultry markets. Taken together, these studies show that eliminating the carryover of live poultry in markets from one day to the next, in the form of rest days or a total ban, is highly effective for reducing viral amplification and persistence in live poultry markets and consequently minimizes zoonotic risk.

Technical Appendix

Weekly number of samples and influenza virus (H9N2) isolation rates for live poultry markets, by poultry type, Hong Kong, September 1999–013;May 2011.
  12 in total

1.  Impact of the implementation of rest days in live bird markets on the dynamics of H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza.

Authors:  G Fournié; F J Guitian; P Mangtani; A C Ghani
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Methods for current statistical analysis of excess pneumonia-influenza deaths.

Authors:  Robert E Serfling
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1963-06       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 3.  Interspecies transmission of influenza viruses: H5N1 virus and a Hong Kong SAR perspective.

Authors:  K F Shortridge; P Gao; Y Guan; T Ito; Y Kawaoka; D Markwell; A Takada; R G Webster
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2000-05-22       Impact factor: 3.293

4.  H9N2 influenza viruses possessing H5N1-like internal genomes continue to circulate in poultry in southeastern China.

Authors:  Y Guan; K F Shortridge; S Krauss; P S Chin; K C Dyrting; T M Ellis; R G Webster; M Peiris
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  Pandemic influenza: a zoonosis?

Authors:  K F Shortridge
Journal:  Semin Respir Infect       Date:  1992-03

6.  Effect of interventions on influenza A (H9N2) isolation in Hong Kong's live poultry markets, 1999-2005.

Authors:  Eric H Y Lau; Y H Connie Leung; Li Juan Zhang; Benjamin J Cowling; Sin Ping Mak; Yi Guan; Gabriel M Leung; J S Malik Peiris
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 6.883

7.  Environmental sampling for avian influenza virus A (H5N1) in live-bird markets, Indonesia.

Authors:  Risa Indriani; Gina Samaan; Anita Gultom; Leo Loth; Sri Irianti; Sri Indryani; Rma Adjid; Ni Luh Putu Indi Dharmayanti; John Weaver; Elizabeth Mumford; Kamalini Lokuge; Paul M Kelly
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 6.883

8.  Risk-based surveillance for avian influenza control along poultry market chains in South China: The value of social network analysis.

Authors:  Vincent Martin; Xiaoyan Zhou; Edith Marshall; Beibei Jia; Guo Fusheng; Mary Ann FrancoDixon; Nicoline DeHaan; Dirk U Pfeiffer; Ricardo J Soares Magalhães; Marius Gilbert
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 2.670

9.  Risk for infection with highly pathogenic influenza A virus (H5N1) in chickens, Hong Kong, 2002.

Authors:  Nina Y Kung; Roger S Morris; Nigel R Perkins; Les D Sims; Trevor M Ellis; Lucy Bissett; Mary Chow; Ken F Shortridge; Yi Guan; Malik J S Peiris
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Avian influenza A H5N1 infections in Bali Province, Indonesia: a behavioral, virological and seroepidemiological study.

Authors:  Ketut Santhia; Ayu Ramy; Putri Jayaningsih; Gina Samaan; Anak Agung Gde Putra; Nyoman Dibia; Cynthia Sulaimin; Gusti Joni; Connie Y H Leung; Joseph Sriyal; Malik Peiris; Toni Wandra; Nyoman Kandun
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.380

View more
  42 in total

1.  Public risk perception and attitudes towards live poultry markets before and after their closure due to influenza A(H7N9), Hong Kong, January-February 2014.

Authors:  Qiuyan Liao; Peng Wu; Wendy Wing Tak Lam; Vicky J Fang; Joseph T Wu; Gabriel M Leung; Richard Fielding; Benjamin J Cowling
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.341

Review 2.  H9 Influenza Viruses: An Emerging Challenge.

Authors:  Silvia Carnaccini; Daniel R Perez
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 6.915

3.  Phylogeography of Highly Pathogenic H5 Avian Influenza Viruses in China.

Authors:  Xiaowen Li; Xueying Li; Bing Xu
Journal:  Virol Sin       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 4.327

4.  Influenza A virus transmission in swine farms and during transport in the swine supply chain.

Authors:  Jonathan Tin Lai Cheung; Eric Hy Lau; Ziying Jin; Huachen Zhu; Yi Guan; Malik Peiris
Journal:  Transbound Emerg Dis       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 4.521

Review 5.  Interventions to reduce zoonotic and pandemic risks from avian influenza in Asia.

Authors:  J S Malik Peiris; Benjamin J Cowling; Joseph T Wu; Luzhao Feng; Yi Guan; Hongjie Yu; Gabriel M Leung
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 25.071

6.  The genetic and antigenic diversity of avian influenza viruses isolated from domestic ducks, muscovy ducks, and chickens in northern and southern Vietnam, 2010-2012.

Authors:  Masatoshi Okamatsu; Tatsuya Nishi; Naoki Nomura; Naoki Yamamoto; Yoshihiro Sakoda; Kenji Sakurai; Huy Duc Chu; Long Pham Thanh; Long Van Nguyen; Nam Van Hoang; Tien Ngoc Tien; Reiko Yoshida; Ayato Takada; Hiroshi Kida
Journal:  Virus Genes       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 2.332

Review 7.  Continuing challenges in influenza.

Authors:  Robert G Webster; Elena A Govorkova
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 8.  Intervention strategies to reduce the risk of zoonotic infection with avian influenza viruses: scientific basis, challenges and knowledge gaps.

Authors:  Leslie D Sims
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.380

9.  Effect of closure of live poultry markets on poultry-to-person transmission of avian influenza A H7N9 virus: an ecological study.

Authors:  Hongjie Yu; Joseph T Wu; Benjamin J Cowling; Qiaohong Liao; Vicky J Fang; Sheng Zhou; Peng Wu; Hang Zhou; Eric H Y Lau; Danhuai Guo; Michael Y Ni; Zhibin Peng; Luzhao Feng; Hui Jiang; Huiming Luo; Qun Li; Zijian Feng; Yu Wang; Weizhong Yang; Gabriel M Leung
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Identifying areas with a high risk of human infection with the avian influenza A (H7N9) virus in East Asia.

Authors:  Trevon Fuller; Fiona Havers; Cuiling Xu; Li-Qun Fang; Wu-Chun Cao; Yuelong Shu; Marc-Alain Widdowson; Thomas B Smith
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 6.072

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.