Literature DB >> 22840717

Obstetrician/gynecologist hospitalists: can we improve safety and outcomes for patients and hospitals and improve lifestyle for physicians?

Rob Olson1, Thomas J Garite, Alan Fishman, Ianthe F Andress.   

Abstract

Over the last 5 years, a new obstetric-gynecologic hospitalist model has emerged rapidly, the primary focus of which is the care and safety of the laboring patient. The need for this type of practitioner has been driven by a number of factors: various types of patient safety programs that require a champion and organizer; the realization that bad outcomes and malpractice lawsuits often result from the lack of immediate availability of a physician in the labor and delivery suite; the desire for many younger practicing physicians to seek a balance between their personal and professional lives; the appeal of shift work as opposed to running a busy private practice; the waning amount of training that new residency graduates receive in critical skills that are needed on labor and delivery; the void in critical care of the laboring patient that is created by the outpatient focus of many physicians in maternal-fetal medicine; the need for hospitals to have a group of physicians to implement protocols and policies on the unit, and the need for teaching in all hospitals, not just academic centers. By having a dedicated group of physicians whose practice is limited mostly to the care of the labor and delivery aspects of patient care, there is great potential to address many of these needs. There are currently 164 known obstetrician/gynecologist hospitalist programs across the United States, with 2 more coming on each month; the newly formed Society of Obstetrician/Gynecologist Hospitalists currently has >80 individual members. This article addresses the advantages, challenges, and variety of Hospitalist models and will suggest that what may be considered an emerging trend is actually a sustainable model for improved patient care and safety.
Copyright © 2012 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22840717     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.06.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  5 in total

1.  In appreciation of the leadership and stewardship of Drs Thomas J. Garite and Moon H. Kim.

Authors:  Ingrid E Nygaard; Roberto Romero
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Two practice models in one labor and delivery unit: association with cesarean delivery rates.

Authors:  Malini Anand Nijagal; Miriam Kuppermann; Sanae Nakagawa; Yvonne Cheng
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Role of the Hospitalist and Maternal Fetal Medicine Physician in Obstetrical Inpatient Care.

Authors:  Lisa D Levine; Jay Schulkin; Brian M Mercer; Daniel O'Keeffe; Vincenzo Berghella; Thomas J Garite
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Comparison between public and private sectors of care and disparities in adverse neonatal outcomes following emergency intrapartum cesarean at term - A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Woonji Jang; Christopher Flatley; Ristan M Greer; Sailesh Kumar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Impact of an Obstetrical Hospitalist Program on the Safety Events in a Mid-Sized Obstetrical Unit.

Authors:  Julie Z Decesare; Suzanne Y Bush; Ashley N Morton
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 2.243

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.