Literature DB >> 22840464

Predicting outcomes of mood, anxiety and somatoform disorders: the Leiden routine outcome monitoring study.

Martijn S van Noorden1, Esther M van Fenema, Nic J A van der Wee, Yanda R van Rood, Ingrid V E Carlier, Frans G Zitman, Erik J Giltay.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mood, anxiety and somatoform (MAS) disorders are highly prevalent disorders with substantial mutual comorbidity and a large disease burden. Early identification of patients at risk for poor outcome in routine clinical practice is of clinical importance. The purpose of this study was to predict outcomes in outpatients with MAS disorders using routine outcome monitoring (ROM) data.
METHODS: We conducted a cohort study of 892 adult MAS patients in a naturalistic outpatient psychiatric specialty care setting and validated our results in a replication cohort of 1392 patients. Poor outcome was defined as a <50% reduction (compared to baseline) on the self-report brief symptom inventory (BSI) or a score of ≥3 on the observer-rated clinical global impression severity scale (CGI-S). During a follow-up of up to 2 years, Cox regression models were used to analyze the independent baseline predictors for poor outcome.
RESULTS: In multivariable Cox regression models, independent and replicated predictors for poor outcome were higher age (overall p<0.001 for combined cohorts in multivariable Cox regression model), having comorbid MAS disorders or a somatoform disorder (<0.001), dysfunctional personality traits (i.e., tendency to self-harm [p<0.001], intimacy problems [p<0.001] and affective lability [p<0.001]), and a low reported general health status (p<0.001). LIMITATIONS: Detailed treatment information was not available.
CONCLUSIONS: MAS patients meeting the profile of being elderly, suffering from comorbid MAS disorders or a somatoform disorder, with cluster B personality traits, and a poor reported general health may need special preventive measures to minimise the risk of poor outcome.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22840464     DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.03.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Affect Disord        ISSN: 0165-0327            Impact factor:   4.839


  7 in total

1.  Prognostic Value of Pathological Personality Traits for Treatment Outcome in Anxiety and Depressive Disorders: The Leiden Routine Outcome Monitoring Study.

Authors:  Wessel A van Eeden; Albert M van Hemert; Erik J Giltay; Philip Spinhoven; Edwin de Beurs; Ingrid V E Carlier
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 1.899

Review 2.  Assessment of Somatization and Medically Unexplained Symptoms in Later Life.

Authors:  T J W van Driel; P H Hilderink; D J C Hanssen; P de Boer; J G M Rosmalen; R C Oude Voshaar
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2017-07-26

3.  Anxiety disorders: Psychiatric comorbidities and psychosocial stressors among adult outpatients.

Authors:  Carla Nel; Linda Augustyn; Nandie Bartman; Marizél Koen; Maggy Liebenberg; Jurgens Naudé; Gina Joubert
Journal:  S Afr J Psychiatr       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 1.550

4.  The Differential Profile of Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD) and Avoidant Personality Disorder (APD) on the Basis of Criterion B of the DSM-5-AMPD in a College Sample.

Authors:  Azad Hemmati; Sahar Rezaei Mirghaed; Fateh Rahmani; Saeid Komasi
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2019-11-04

5.  Brain-derived neurotrophic factor serum levels in genetically isolated populations: gender-specific association with anxiety disorder subtypes but not with anxiety levels or Val66Met polymorphism.

Authors:  Davide Carlino; Ruggiero Francavilla; Gabriele Baj; Karolina Kulak; Pio d'Adamo; Sheila Ulivi; Stefania Cappellani; Paolo Gasparini; Enrico Tongiorgi
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Impact of personality status on the outcomes and cost of cognitive-behavioural therapy for health anxiety.

Authors:  Rahil Sanatinia; Duolao Wang; Peter Tyrer; Helen Tyrer; Mike Crawford; Sylvia Cooper; Gemma Loebenberg; Barbara Barrett
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 9.319

7.  Depressive symptoms rather than executive functioning predict group cognitive behavioural therapy outcome in binge eating disorder.

Authors:  Alexandra E Dingemans; Gabriëlle E van Son; Christine B Vanhaelen; Eric F van Furth
Journal:  Eur Eat Disord Rev       Date:  2020-07-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.