Literature DB >> 22839705

Achieving treat to target in gout: a clinical practice improvement project.

A Y N Lim1, L Shen, C H Tan, A Lateef, T C Lau, G G Teng.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Gout care is suboptimal because of lack of translation of knowledge into real-world practice, despite evidence-based guidelines. We have developed processes to ensure systematic care for gout patients and determined the predictors for achievement of a target serum uric acid (SUA) concentration of < 360 μmol/L in a prospective cohort of Asian gout patients requiring allopurinol therapy.
METHODS: A 1-year clinical practice improvement project was undertaken using evidence-based guidelines and quality planning tools. Interventions included comprehensive patient education, enhanced telephone access, reappointments and refills, upward titration of allopurinol with no limitation specified by renal function, and increased frequency of visits until the target SUA concentration was achieved. The primary outcome was the time to achieve an SUA level of <360 μmol/L.
RESULTS: We recruited 126 gout patients. The median time to achieving the target SUA concentration was 36.9 weeks [95% confidence interval (CI) 29.3-44.4]. Based on survival analysis, the proportion of patients achieving the target was 8.1% (95% CI 3.2-13.0), 40.6% (95% CI 31.4-50.8), and 72.0% (95% CI 61.2-82.8) at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. On average, our patients who achieved the target were seen once every 2 months and achieved the target after a mean of 2.5 (SD = 1.1) visits. Frequency of follow-up visits and older patients not taking aspirin were independent predictors associated with achieving the target outcome, regardless of renal function.
CONCLUSIONS: Optimization of control of SUA is achievable, even in the setting of renal impairment, by redesigning and implementing processes involving changes in physician prescribing habits, enhanced nursing interventions, and patient empowerment and education.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22839705     DOI: 10.3109/03009742.2012.689325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0300-9742            Impact factor:   3.641


  7 in total

1.  Gout treatment: when a tablet is not enough.

Authors:  Bonifacio Alvarez-Lario; José L Alonso-Valdivielso
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 20.543

2.  Reply: Gout treatment--more tablets might be needed.

Authors:  Fernando Perez-Ruiz; Ana Maria Herrero-Beites
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 20.543

3.  Poorly controlled gout: who is doing poorly?

Authors:  Faith Li-Ann Chia
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.858

4.  Pharmacist-managed titration of urate-lowering therapy to streamline gout management.

Authors:  Irvin J Huang; Jean W Liew; Meredith B Morcos; Silu Zuo; Carol Crawford; Alison M Bays
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 2.631

5.  Health literacy in patients dealing with gout: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Marloes van Onna; Elke Hinsenveld; Hein de Vries; Annelies Boonen
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  Cost-effectiveness of an adherence-enhancing intervention for gout based on real-world data.

Authors:  Lydia Wenxin Lin; Gim Gee Teng; Anita Yee Nah Lim; Joanne Su-Yin Yoong; Niklas Zethraeus; Hwee-Lin Wee
Journal:  Int J Rheum Dis       Date:  2018-12-16       Impact factor: 2.454

7.  Improving outcomes for patients hospitalized with gout: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mark D Russell; Benjamin D Clarke; Edward Roddy; James B Galloway
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 7.580

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.