| Literature DB >> 22839700 |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The association between risky sexual behaviours and substance uses among Ghanaian youth were investigated.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22839700 PMCID: PMC3517501 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-571
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Distribution (%) of sexual behaviour variables by gender
| No | 74.7 | 71.6 | 77.3 |
| Yes | 25.3 | 28.4 | 22.7 |
| <11 to 14 years | 41.3 | 44.1 | 38.7 |
| 15 to 17 years | 42.6 | 40.2 | 45.2 |
| 18 years | 16.2 | 15.7 | 16.1 |
| 1 person | 66.3 | 61.5 | 70.5 |
| 2 persons | 14.9 | 13.8 | 16.5 |
| 3 persons | 7.6 | 10.3 | 6.2 |
| 4 persons or more | 10.6 | 14.4 | 6.2 |
| Condom | 51.5 | 53.8 | 49.7 |
| Oral contraceptives | 9.4 | 10.7 | 8.1 |
| Condom and oral contraceptives | 4.4 | 3.0 | 5.8 |
| No contraceptives | 31.2 | 30.0 | 32.4 |
| Other kind | 3.5 | 2.4 | 4.0 |
| No | 93.4 | 92.0 | 95.3 |
| Yes | 6.6 | 8.0 | 4.7 |
| No | 94.3 | 92.7 | 96.1 |
| Yes | 5.7 | 7.3 | 3.9 |
| No | 90.9 | 88.5 | 93.6 |
| Yes | 9.1 | 11.5 | 6.4 |
| Less often or never | 87.8 | 85.5 | 89.8 |
| Often (once or twice a week or | | | |
| often) | 12.2 | 14.5 | 10.2 |
| No | 92.8 | 91.0 | 94.9 |
| Yes | 7.2 | 9.0 | 5.1 |
| No | 94.8 | 93.2 | 95.4 |
| Yes | 5.2 | 6.8 | 4.6 |
The distribution (%) of the socioeconomic measures of the study subjects by gender
| Poorest | 21.9 | 16.5 |
| Second poorest | 23.1 | 14.7 |
| Average | 20.5 | 19.3 |
| Affluent | 13.9 | 21.9 |
| Most Affluent | 15.7 | 21.2 |
| Missing | 5.0 | 6.4 |
| Both parents dead | 5.4 | 2.0 |
| Only one parent alive | 17.9 | 16.7 |
| Both parents alive but not living together | 21.9 | 21.2 |
| Nuclear family | 54.4 | 59.5 |
| Missing | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Below average | 8.6 | 16.5 |
| Average | 48.4 | 54.2 |
| Above average | 42.2 | 28.8 |
| Missing | 0.8 | 0.5 |
| Won’t continue schooling | 14.3 | 10.2 |
| Continue schooling | 84.3 | 89.5 |
| missing | 1.4 | 0.3 |
Odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) of risky sexual behaviours by substance use behaviours among adolescents in bivariate and multivariate analyses
| | ||||||||
| | ||||||||
| | | | | | ||||
| | | | | | | | | |
| No | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Yes | 4.1 (2.3-7.2) | 1.4 (0.7-2.6) | 9.5 (4.6-19.3) | 17.7 (8.4-37.3) | 3.7 (2.0-6.8) | | 8.4 (3.7-18.8) | 16.5 (7.0-39.0) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| No | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Yes | 3.7 (2.1-6.7) | 1.3 (0.7-2.5) | 9.8 (4.7-20.8) | 16.6 (7.6-36.3) | 2.4 (1.3-4.7) | | 5.7 (2.5-12.8) | 10.4 (4.4-24.6) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| No | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Yes | 3.5 (2.2-5.5) | 1.3 (0.8-2.3) | 8.3 (4.7-14.8) | 16.4 (9.0-29.8) | 2.8 (1.7-4.7) | | 6.3 (3.3-11.9) | 13.7 (6.9-26.9) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Less often or never | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Often (once or weak or more often) | 2.1 (1.4-3.3) | 1.4 (0.8-2.4) | 2.1 (1.3-3.3) | 4.4 (2.6-7.3) | 1.7 (1.1-2.8) | | 1.7 (1.1-2.8) | 3.3 (1.9-5.8) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| No | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Yes | 4.8 (2.4-9.7) | 1.2 (0.6-2.6) | 6.5 (2.6-16.2) | 24.4 (10.4-57.2) | 3.3 (1.6-7.0) | | 4.5 (1.7-11.6) | 17.1 (6.7-43.3) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| No | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Yes | 2.2 (1.1-4.6) | 1.9 (0.8-4.1) | 6.0 (2.4-15.1) | 20.5 (8.6-48.7) | 1.2 (0.6-2.8) | 3.0 (1.1-8.2) | 9.1 (3.5-24.0) | |
*Multinomial logistic regression analysis, reference group is none (no sexual partner).
**Adjusted for age, gender, place of residence, material affluence scale, family structure, school performance and plans after graduation.
Statistical significance level was set at p < 0.05.