Literature DB >> 22837455

Taste preference for amino acids is dependent on internal nutritional state in Drosophila melanogaster.

Naoko Toshima1, Teiichi Tanimura.   

Abstract

Like mammals, insects need to ingest proteins from foods because they cannot synthesise several amino acids. Amino acids are also essential nutrients for Drosophila melanogaster, especially for female egg production, but how flies detect amino acids and how the feeding response to amino acids is regulated are unknown. In this study, the two-choice preference test, the proboscis extension reflex test and a CAFE assay were performed to explore the ability of D. melanogaster to detect and discriminate amino acids. To determine whether D. melanogaster change their feeding preference to amino acids after being deprived of them, as previously reported in the locust, two groups of flies raised on the usual medium or on glucose medium were compared. Amino-acid-deprived flies demonstrated enhanced preference to an amino acid mixture and to several amino acids. These flies ingested amino acids even when they were replete with glucose. The proboscis extension reflex to particular amino acids was induced only in amino-acid-deprived flies. Our findings indicate that the sensitivity of labellar taste cells to amino acids may change when flies are deficient in amino acid supply, and also reveal that the detection pathways for individual amino acids may differ. We suggest the existence of an amino acid receptor and a monitoring system regulating the feeding responses to amino acids.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22837455     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.069146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  37 in total

Review 1.  The Systemic Control of Growth.

Authors:  Laura Boulan; Marco Milán; Pierre Léopold
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 10.005

2.  Branch-specific plasticity of a bifunctional dopamine circuit encodes protein hunger.

Authors:  Qili Liu; Masashi Tabuchi; Sha Liu; Lay Kodama; Wakako Horiuchi; Jay Daniels; Lucinda Chiu; Daniel Baldoni; Mark N Wu
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Sex differences in Drosophila behavior: Qualitative and Quantitative Dimorphism.

Authors:  Kenta Asahina
Journal:  Curr Opin Physiol       Date:  2018-04-17

Review 4.  Nutrient-sensing mechanisms across evolution.

Authors:  Lynne Chantranupong; Rachel L Wolfson; David M Sabatini
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 5.  Peripheral coding of taste.

Authors:  Emily R Liman; Yali V Zhang; Craig Montell
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 6.  Cellular and molecular basis of decision-making.

Authors:  Nilay Yapici; Manuel Zimmer; Ana I Domingos
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 8.807

7.  A Molecular and Cellular Context-Dependent Role for Ir76b in Detection of Amino Acid Taste.

Authors:  Anindya Ganguly; Lisa Pang; Vi-Khoi Duong; Angelina Lee; Hanni Schoniger; Erika Varady; Anupama Dahanukar
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 8.  Gustatory processing and taste memory in Drosophila.

Authors:  Pavel Masek; Alex C Keene
Journal:  J Neurogenet       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.250

9.  Diverse Food-Sensing Neurons Trigger Idiothetic Local Search in Drosophila.

Authors:  Román A Corfas; Tarun Sharma; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 10.  Olfactory Mechanisms for Discovery of Odorants to Reduce Insect-Host Contact.

Authors:  Jonathan T Clark; Anandasankar Ray
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 2.626

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.